Skip to content
Topic Contested in court

Delegation of Powers

LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this topic. Contains: the overview, key law text, case law, enforcement and guidance for this topic. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

The content specifically addresses 'Exercise of the delegation' which is a distinct procedural topic covering how delegated powers are exercised, implemented, and managed within the AI Act framework. This topic is not adequately covered by existing topics and deserves its own dedicated classification.

15 linked items 12 Laws3 Guidance

Overview

16 sources · Jul 23, 2026

Legal Framework

The exercise of delegated powers under the AI Act is governed by Article 97, which establishes the procedural conditions under which the European Commission may adopt delegated acts. The Commission's authority is not open-ended: delegation is confined to non-essential elements of the legislation and is subject to express limits set by the co-legislators. The Commission must consult designated experts from each Member State before adopting any delegated act, and the delegation itself may be revoked or lapse under conditions defined by the European Parliament and Council.

This architecture mirrors the delegation framework in the Digital Services Act, where Article 87 DSA prescribes analogous procedural safeguards. The parallel structure reflects a broader EU legislative pattern: delegated acts may supplement or amend certain provisions but cannot expand the regulatory scope beyond what the enabling act permits. Under DSA Article 83, the Commission may also adopt implementing acts to set practical procedural arrangements, including hearing procedures and information disclosure protocols, provided it first publishes draft provisions and invites stakeholder comment within a specified timeframe.

Key Developments

The delegation provisions have begun generating practical effects. The Commission's authority under Article 15-related delegation powers extends to specifying what information standardized icons must display and the procedures for their development — a concrete example of how non-essential elements are fleshed out through delegated acts rather than left to Member State discretion.

The procedural consultation requirement has emerged as a meaningful constraint. Where the Commission fails to properly engage the expert group mechanism, delegated acts face legal vulnerability. The DSA's implementing-act framework under Article 83 reinforces that stakeholder consultation is not merely procedural courtesy but a condition of validity: draft provisions must be published, and interested parties must be given a defined window to submit observations before adoption.

Practical Guidance

  • Map delegation boundaries precisely: Identify which AI Act provisions expressly authorize delegated acts and distinguish essential elements (reserved to the legislature) from non-essential elements (open to delegation). Compliance strategies should not assume the Commission will fill gaps beyond its delegated mandate.

  • Monitor expert group consultations: Track when the Commission consults Member State experts under Article 97, as these consultations signal forthcoming delegated acts and provide a window to influence their content.

  • Engage in DSA-style stakeholder comment periods: Where implementing acts are contemplated (as under DSA Article 83), submit observations within the published deadline. This is a concrete opportunity to shape procedural arrangements before they are finalized.

  • Assess revocation and lapse risks: Track European Parliament and Council actions regarding potential revocation of specific delegations, as this can alter the regulatory landscape mid-compliance cycle.

  • Audit icon and transparency obligations: For AI systems subject to Article 15-type requirements, anticipate that delegated acts will specify icon content and standardization procedures — build flexibility into compliance design to accommodate these specifications as they emerge.

Everything on this topic, by type links go to the exact provision / paragraph / section
Laws 12
Art. 101(6) The Commission shall adopt implementing acts containing detailed arrangements and procedural safeguards for proceedings in view of the possible adopti… AI Act Art. 108(1) in Article 17, the following paragraph is added: ‘3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, when adopting implementing acts pursuant to paragraph 1 concern… AI Act Art. 108(2) in Article 19, the following paragraph is added: ‘4. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 concerning Artificial Intelligence sy… AI Act Art. 108(3) in Article 43, the following paragraph is added: ‘4. When adopting implementing acts pursuant to paragraph 1 concerning Artificial Intelligence system… AI Act rec 173 Recital 173 — Commission delegated powers to adapt AI rules AI Act Jun 2024 art 97 Exercise of the delegation AI Act Jun 2024 art 104 Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 AI Act Jun 2024 art 106 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2016/797 AI Act Jun 2024 rec 117 Recital 117 — general-purpose AI model compliance codes AI Act Jun 2024 art 109 Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 AI Act Jun 2024 art 103 Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 AI Act Jun 2024 rec 52 Recital 52 — classification of standalone high-risk AI systems AI Act Jun 2024 art 107 Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 AI Act Jun 2024 rec 49 Recital 49 — high-risk AI safety products sectoral regulations AI Act Jun 2024 rec 101 Recital 101 — General-purpose AI model provider transparency obligations AI Act Jun 2024 rec 121 Recital 121 — standardisation for regulatory compliance and innovation AI Act Jun 2024
Guidance 3
edps joint opinion 032021 on the proposal for a regulation of EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2021 on the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European data governance (Data Governance Act) EDPB Mar 2021 edps joint opinion 032022 on the proposal for a regulation on EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2022 on the Proposal for a Regulation on the European Health Data Space EDPB Jul 2022 edps joint opinion 022023 on the proposal for a regulation of EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 02/2023 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the digital euro EDPB Oct 2023