Where another supervisory authority should act as a lead supervisory authority for the processing activities of the controller or processor but the concrete subject matter of a complaint or the possible infringement concerns only processing activities of the controller or processor in the Member State where the complaint has been lodged or the possible infringement detected and the matter does not substantially affect or is not likely to substantially affect data subjects in other Member States, the supervisory authority receiving a complaint or detecting or being informed otherwise of situations that entail possible infringements of this Regulation should seek an amicable settlement with the controller and, if this proves unsuccessful, exercise its full range of powers. This should include: specific processing carried out in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority or with regard to data subjects on the territory of that Member State; processing that is carried out in the context of an offer of goods or services specifically aimed at data subjects in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority; or processing that has to be assessed taking into account relevant legal obligations under Member State law.
GDPR Recital EN
Recital 131
Related across sources
Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement Guidance Version history Guidance Guidelines 9/2022 on personal data breach notification under GDPR News CNIL (France) - SAN-2025-014 News CNIL (France) - SAN-2025-014 Guidance Guidelines 1/2018 on certification and identifying certification criteria in accordance with Articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation