Skip to content
Literature · International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Trends in Interpretation of EU Data Protection Authorities of Cybersecurity Requirements Under the GDPR

Larisa GĂBUDEANU — International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime

Larisa GĂBUDEANU — International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime

International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime
DOI

Full text

One of the main legal requirements for the adopting the GDPR was the technical and organizational security requirements, alongside the transparency and purpose limitation principles. The wide wording mentioned by the GDPR in terms of state-of-the-art security measures has given rise to a series of interpretations both in literature and by the data controllers and data processors. The manner in which national data protection authorities interpret this wording on a case-by-case basis is a good indicator in terms of interpretation, as the authorities look into the specific use case requiring preventive security measures. Thus, this research paper brings additional clarity in the interpretation of this legal requirement in terms of the risks and damages considered relevant for the specific data breach or lack of proper legal requirement implementation, given publicly available information in this respect. Further, the research paper highlights the number of use cases analyzed by different national data protection authorities and the views of each national data protection authority.

How it connects

C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Controllers Personal Data
C-768/21 TR v Land Hessen In Case C-768/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning TR's challenge of… CJEU ·First Chamber Sep 26, 2024 Supervision Data Breaches Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
14/2021 Cypriot court backs DPA fines of €40,000 each on football clubs and €25,000 on processor On 26 July 2021, a journalist informed the Cypriot DPA of a security vulnerability on an online platform. This online platform hosted ticket purchase sites of two Cypriot football… Administrative Court of Cyprus May 12, 2026 Controllers Processors Privacy by Design & Default
15625/2026 Cass.Civ. - 15625/2026 Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS, the controller) is the Italian National Institute for Social Security. In 2021, the DPA fined the controller €300,000 for its… Supreme Court May 21, 2026 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Design DPIA
Us I-2709/2025-11 INA, a petrol station chain in Croatia, appealed, AZOP's, the DPA's, €5000 fine The fine was based on AZOP's decision that INA, as a controller, did not take all necessary measures to prevent unauthorised access and visibility of the real-time CCTV feeds to… US Split - Us I-2709/2025-11 ·Administrative court Split May 5, 2026 Legitimate Interest Integrity and Confidentiality Principle IP Address