Skip to content
Enforcement · IP (Slovenia) ·07121-1/2020/1570 EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

IP Slovenia: ZEKom-1 governs legal basis for NIJZ #StayHealthy SMS to users

The IP received a request for an opinion concerning sending of an SMS message to users about the new #StayHealthy app created by the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ).

Status Not cited by any decision here yet

Original title: IP - 07121-1/2020/1570

Holding

The IP held that Article 6(3) GDPR applies in this context. As such the legal basis for processing is laid down by the Slovenian Electronic Communications Act (ZEKom-1). To come to this conclusion, the IP referred to the EDPB Opinion 5/2019 on the relationship between the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC (transposed into Slovenian law by ZEKom-1) and the GDPR to establish that ZEKom-1 applies. The IP found that there are restrictions imposed by ZEKom-1 on electronic communications operators regarding lawful data processing. Article 148 ZEKom-1 provides a legal basis for processing subscribers' data, but limits the purposes for which such data is processed with the consent of the data subject. IP added that Article 158 ZEKom-1 restricts sending of unsolicited communications for the purpose of direct marketing through SMS messages. Such communications are only permitted on the basis of consent or certain exceptions. According to IP, the restriction in Article 158 applies to commercial and non-commercial communications, including for the promotion of ideas, political promotions and promotions by NGOs. Therefore, it is unlikely that unsolicited communications on ground relating to emergencies are exempt. Therefore, there was no legal basis for the SMS.

From GDPRhub’s case note — a summary of the decision, not its own words. Read it in the text ↓

Summary

The SMS message was to be carried out on a voluntary basis by operators at the initiative of NIJZ. The opinion relates to the legal basis for this SMS message. Dispute — Is there a legal basis under Slovenian national law for sending an SMS message to all users about a new application launched by the Slovenian National Institute of Public Health?

Full text 5 findings

Machine translation of the decision, via GDPRhub — not the official text. Read the original

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

Date: 09/11/2020 Title: Opinion on SMS notifications about the installation of the #StayHealth app Number: 07121-1 / 2020/1570 Subject matter: Legal basis, Telecommunications and Post Legal act: Opinion The Information Commissioner (hereinafter: IP) has received your letter asking us for an opinion on sending an SMS message to all users, with a notification about the new application #StayHealthy , prepared by N IJZ. The NIJZ also provided you with the opinion of the Government Office for Legislation, according to which the legal basis for sending a message should be Article 9 or 10 of ZVOP-1, according to the opinion of the IP from 2016 in the context of sending SMS messages about consular services. Ask us to comment on the proposed legal basis . You definitely want to help, but you by sending don’t want to break the law . On the basis of the information you have provided to us, hereinafter referred to as Article 58 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter: the General Regulation), point 7 of the first paragraph of Article 49 of the Personal Data Protection Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 94/07, official consolidated text, hereinafter ZVOP-1) and 2 Article of the Information Commissioner Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 113/05, hereinafter ZInfP), we provide our non-binding opinion on your question.

§

At the beginning, we explain that the Information Commissioner gives non-binding opinions and explanations, but he cannot assess specific actions of personal data processing outside the inspection procedures. Article 6 of the General Regulation sets out the legal basis on which the controller may lawfully process personal data. Among other things, the basis for processing may be determined by special legislation, in accordance with Article 6 (3) of the General Regulation. Special legislation governing the processing of personal data in the field of electronic communications services provided by electronic communications operators is the Electronic Communications Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 109/12, as amended; ZEKom -1). The Data Protection Committee (EDPB) adopted an opinion (No. 5/2019) on the relationship between the General Regulation and the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58 / EC (this directive has been transposed into Slovenian law by ZEKom-1).

§

In the opinion, which is binding for IP in terms of uniform interpretation, the committee explains that the legal bases for the processing of personal data in this area are set out in ZEKom-1, as a special act. In the context of the activities of the operator regulated by ZEKom-1, the legal basis referred to in Article 6 of the General Regulation is not applied, but the basis set out in ZEKom-1. If there is no legal basis for a certain processing of personal data in ZEKom-1, such processing cannot be lawful from the point of view of the principle of personal data processing referred to in Article 5 of the General Regulation. The IP opinion to which you refer in your letter does not relate to an identical situation, but also to the framework as it was before the entry into force of the General Regulation in 2018. Following the application of the General Regulation, the IP must also take into account for data protection - e.g. mentioned opinion no. 5/2019.

§

As already explained in opinion 07121-1 / 2020/1348 on this topic, IP considers that in defining the legal bases on which the operator should send an SMS notification to all its users that the Ostanizdrav application is available to it, ZEKom-1, which imposes restrictions on electronic communications operators regarding the permissible processing of personal data and the provision of services. The direct and explicit legal basis for SMS notification, which would be carried out voluntarily by the operator in the manner described, but at the initiative of the NIJZ, does not follow from the stated provisions of ZEKom-1. At the same time, IP emphasizes that it is not responsible for the interpretation and control of the provisions of ZEKom-1, as this falls within the competence of the Agency for Communication Networks and Services of the Republic of Slovenia (AKOS). We note, however, without prejudice to the competence of AKOS for the interpretation and control of ZEKom-1, that in Article 148 it includes the legal basis for the permissible processing of subscribers' data and narrowly limits the purposes for which data may be processed. with the consent of the contracting authority.

§

Article 158 of ZEKom-1 also restricts the sending of unsolicited communications for the purpose of direct marketing via e-mail, SMS and MMS messages and allows this on the basis of consent or in certain exceptions. Personal data protection supervisors certainly understand the provision on unsolicited communications in the sense that it includes restrictions on the sending of all types of unsolicited messages, whether commercial or non-commercial, such as. for the purpose of promoting ideas, political promotion, promotion of NGOs, etc. As in the previous opinion, we also express doubts about the adequacy of the use of grounds relating to emergencies. Prepared by: Dr. Jelena Burnik, Head of International Cooperation and Supervision Mojca Prelesnik, B.Sc. Information Commissioner

How it connects

5 of 5 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) Het Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste Kamer) beantwoordt een prejudiciële vraag over de uitleg van artikel 13 van Richtlijn 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy) en de verhouding tot de GDPR,… CJEU Mar 27, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Marketing
C-129/21 Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In a preliminary ruling requested by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed the interpretation of Article 12 of Directive 2002/58/EC… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 27, 2022 Right to be Forgotten Telecommunications Personal Data
W 108 2284491-1 The data subject visited a website operated by a media company (the controller) Upon opening the website a cookie banner showed up. This cookie banner was designed in such a way that a reject button was “hidden” in a second layer. The cookie banner’s first… BVwG - W 108 2284491-1 ·Federal Administrative Court Jul 31, 2024 Direct Marketing Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Fairness & Transparency
Guidelines 05/2020 consent under Regulation 2016/679 Guidelines on consent Guidelines ·EDPB May 4, 2020 Consent Personal Data IP Address
KHO:2026:64 KHO: Consent required for cookies and web requests; no CJEU referral needed A media company that provides news services did not request user context for the placement and use of cookies or certain web requests on several websites it managed. In June 2023,… Supreme Administrative Court Aug 27, 2026 Consent Recipient IP Address
473833 The DPA imposed an €8 million administrative fine on Apple (the controller) in 2022 (CNIL - SAN-2022-025) The DPA found that Apple used identifiers stored on users’ devices to enable personalized advertising in the App Store without first obtaining valid user consent, as required by… CE - 473833 ·Supreme Administrative Court Oct 10, 2025 Material scope (GDPR) Personal Data Controllers