Skip to content
News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

1,741 “informed” consents with one click?! GDPR complaint against dict.cc filed

Cookie Banners Today, noyb has filed a complaint against the popular online dictionary dict.cc.

How it connects

1713/2026 High Court of Justice of the Basque Country · TSJ PV - 1713/2026 The data subject had worked for Fineco Sociedad de Valores, SA and GIIC Fineco Sociedad Gestora de Instituciones de Inversión Colectiva, SAU, the controller, since 2004. The data… Jul 17, 2026 Personal Data Monitoring Consent
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities Supervision Consent
CJEU: Processing of beneficiary data not based on consent; individuals must be informed Purpose for processing: The legislation at issue does base the processing on consent. Rather, it provides that they are to be informed. Thus, processing is not based on their… Nov 9, 2010 Consent Personal Data Right to Restriction
451423 French Supreme Court reviews CNIL €35M cookie consent fine against Amazon The French DPA had received a complaint on 28 May 2018 regarding the lawfulness of processing by Amazon Europe Core ('Provider' or 'The company'). The French DPA had forwarded… Supreme Administrative Court Jun 27, 2022 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Telecommunications

Full text

Cookie Banners Today, noyb has filed a complaint against the popular online dictionary dict.cc. The GDPR requires that consent is freely given, informed, specific and unambiguous. However, when visiting dict.cc, users are nudged into consenting to online tracking by a staggering 1,741 (!) “partners” with a single click. This makes it impossible for users to know exactly who has access to their data and how it is actually used. While dict.cc is an extreme example, requests to blindly waive your right to privacy for countless third parties is unfortunately a common issue with websites and apps relying on online advertising, even 8 years after the GDPR came into force. Complaint against dict.cc (EN - auto-translation)Complaint against dict.cc (DE - original)Background. Online advertising companies heavily rely on tracking people’s browsing habits, their interests, interactions and whereabouts to show them personalised ads. However, according to EU privacy law, online tracking is illegal b