Skip to content
Enforcement · ANSPDCP (Romania) ·Fine against GEROCOSSEN S.R.L. EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Fine against GEROCOSSEN S.R.L.

Gerocossen SRL (the controller) suffered a cyberattack that affected its IT infrastructure.

Status Not cited by any decision here yet

€26,237 Fine
Romania
Art. 32 GDPR

Holding

The DPA found that the controller infringed Article 32(1)(b) GDPR and Article 32(2) GDPR by failing to implement adequate technical and organisational measures in order to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of its processing systems and services. In particular, the DPA considered that the controller had failed to adopt security measures appropriate to protect personal data processed through its IT infrastructure. In addition, as a corrective measure pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, the DPA ordered the controller to implement access monitoring and logging systems within the IT infrastructure used for personal data processing. The authority further required the controller to retain access logs for at least 30 days and to introduce backup procedures for those logs. Finally, the Romanian DPA fined the controller €5,000 (RON 26,236.50).

From GDPRhub’s case note — a summary of the decision, not its own words. Read it in the text ↓

Summary

As a result, unauthorised parties gained access to personal data relating to some data subjects, including identification and contact details. The controller notified the breach to the DPA.

Full text 2 findings

Machine translation of the decision, via GDPRhub — not the official text. Read the original

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

August 28, 2026 Penalty for GDPR Violation In July 2026, the National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing concluded an investigation into the data controller GEROCOSSEN S.R.L. and found a violation of the provisions of Article 32(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. As a result, the data controller was fined 26,236.50 lei, equivalent to 5,000 euros. The investigation was initiated following the submission by the data controller, GEROCOSSEN S.R.L., of a notification of a personal data breach, in accordance with the provisions of Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The data breach occurred as a result of a cyberattack on the controller’s IT infrastructure, a situation that led to the unauthorized disclosure of or unauthorized access to personal data belonging to data subjects (identification data, contact information). During the investigation, it was found that the controller had not implemented adequate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk posed by the processing, including the ability to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of processing systems and services, thereby violating the provisions of Article 32(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

§

At the same time, pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) of the Regulation, the controller was ordered to implement corrective measures to establish monitoring/logging of access to the IT infrastructure used for the processing of personal data, including a retention period for access logs of at least 30 days, as well as the implementation of a backup process for these logs. Legal and Communications Directorate A.N.S.P.D.C.P

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-768/21 TR v Land Hessen In Case C-768/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning TR's challenge of… First Chamber Sep 26, 2024 Supervision Data Breaches Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Controllers Personal Data
C-741/21 GP v juris GmbH In Case C-741/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) addressed a preliminary reference from the Landgericht Saarbrücken in proceedings between data subject… Third Chamber Apr 11, 2024 Liability Personal Data Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-687/21 BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH In Case C-687/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Articles 5, 24, 32, and 82 of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling request from the Amtsgericht… Third Chamber Jan 25, 2024 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Personal Data