Enforcement · Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and the Freedom of Information (NAIH) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Representative of a local government: Insufficient legal basis for data processing

€290 Fine
Representative of a local government
HUNGARY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR Art. 12 GDPR Art. 15 GDPR Art. 17 GDPR
Consent Public Authority Education Social Media Processing Representatives Public Sector
Mar 4, 2020 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Literature General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ambiguity, national diversity and data protection officer certification: Implementing Art. 39(1) GDPR in France, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain Journal of Data Protection Privacy Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Malta: An Overview of the GDPR Implementation European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Finland: A Brief Overview of the GDPR Implementation European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Hungary: Introduction to the GDPR Application and a Brief History of Data Protection European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Portugal: A Brief Overview of the GDPR Implementation European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Romania: Overview of the GDPR Implementation European Data Protection Law Review

Full text

A local representative took a photo of the director of a company fully owned by the local government depicting the director allegedly tearing off an election poster of the opposition in the company of his child. The local representative uploaded the photo to his Facebook page. The child’s image was blurred, yet it was hinted in the post that she was the daughter of the director. The director told the local representative at the scene that he does not consent to the taking of the photo. NAIH determined that the act of the director was not public information and the photo does not prove that the director torn off an election poster. NAIH also underpinned that only the name of the director of the company fully owned by the local government was public information.

Industry: Public Sector and Education

Original document at the source www.naih.hu

Similar Content