Skip to content
Enforcement · Data Protection Authority of Hamburg EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop A.B. & Co. KG: Insufficient legal basis for data processing

The fashion company with seat in Hamburg operates a service center in Nuremberg.

€35,258,708 Fine
H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop A.B. & Co. KG
GERMANY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The fashion company with seat in Hamburg operates a service center in Nuremberg. Here, according to the findings of the Hamburg data protection officer, since at least 2014 private life circumstances of some of the employees have been comprehensively recorded and this information stored on a network drive. For example, the company conducted a 'Welcome Back Talk' after employees returned to work after vacation or illness. The information that became known in this context - including information on the symptoms of illness and diagnoses of the employees - was recorded and stored. In addition, according to the Hamburg data protection authority, some supervisors also used the 'Flurfunk' [meaning to hear something through the grapevine] to acquire a broad knowledge of individual employees, for example about family problems and religious beliefs. The information stored on the network drive was accessible to up to 50 managers of the company and was used, among other things, to evaluate the work performance of the employees and to make employment decisions.The data collection became known due to a technical configuration error in October 2019, according to which the data stored on the network drive was accessible company-wide for several hours.

§

After the violation became known, the management apologized to the employees and offered monetary compensation. In addition, also further protective measures were introduced together with the data protection authority. [Note: Concrete legal basis of the fine not yet published - we assume this will mainly be Art. 5 and 6 GDPR] GDPR Articles: Art. 5 GDPR, Art. 6 GDPR Industry: Employment

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
Guidelines 1/2020 processing personal data in the context of connected vehicles and mobility related applications Guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices Guidelines ·EDPB Jan 28, 2020 Personal Data Privacy by Design & Default Processing
C-507/17 Google LLC v CNIL C-507/17 (Google Territorial Scope) CJEU Sep 24, 2019 Territorial scope (GDPR) Right to be Forgotten Direct Marketing