Enforcement · Data Protection Authority of Sweden (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Directorate of the Östra Skaraborg Rescue Service: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

€34,800 Fine
Directorate of the Östra Skaraborg Rescue Service
SWEDEN
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 32 GDPR
Video Surveillance Monitoring Audit Logs Employees IP Address Controllers Supervisory Authorities Processing Agreement
Jun 9, 2021 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

News Danish SA Declares Use of Google Analytics Unlawful Without Supplementary Measures Datatilsynet Guidance Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) EDPB News De Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens publiceert een rapport over de risicoanalyse van de AVG (Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming). AEPD News De Deense beschermingsautoriteit (SA) heeft verklaard dat het gebruik van Google Analytics onrechtmatig is zonder aanvullende maatregelen. Datatilsynet News Irish Data Protection Commissioner Fines Instagram EUR 405M for Children Privacy Violations Hunton Andrews Kurth News De Ierse autoriteit voor gegevensbescherming heeft Instagram een boete van 405 miljoen euro opgelegd vanwege schendingen van de privacy van kinderen. Hunton Andrews Kurth

Full text

The Swedish DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 34,800 on the directorate of the Östra Skaraborg Rescue Service. The DPA had received information that several fire stations in Östra Skaraborg operated surveillance cameras that filmed areas where firefighters were changing during an emergency, whereupon it initiated a review of the camera surveillance. The video surveillance was taking place around the clock, although the controller itself stated that video surveillance was only required in case of emergency alarms. The DPA concludes that the 24/7 monitoring was too far-reaching, but notes that the controller had weighty reasons for the camera surveillance. However, the camera surveillance should be limited to emergencie cases. The fine is composed proportionally of EUR 29,800 for a violation of Art. 5 (1) a), c) GDPR and EUR 5,000 for a violation of Art. 32 (1), (4) GDPR.

Industry: Employment

Original document at the source www.imy.se

Similar Content