Skip to content
Enforcement · French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Monsanto Company: Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations

The French DPA (CNIL) has fined MONSANTO EUR 400,000.

€400,000 Fine
Monsanto Company
FRANCE
Art. 14 GDPR Art. 28 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The French DPA (CNIL) has fined MONSANTO EUR 400,000. In May 2019, several media revealed that MONSANTO was in possession of a file containing the personal data of more than 200 political figures or members of civil society (e.g. journalists, environmental activists, scientists or farmers) likely to influence the debate or public opinion on the renewal of the authorization of glyphosate in Europe. At the same time, the CNIL received seven complaints from data subjects affected by this file. For each of these individuals, the file contained information such as the organization they belonged to, the position they held, their business address, their business phone number, their cell phone number, their business email address, and in some cases their Twitter account. In addition, CNIL noted that each person was assigned a score from 1 to 5 to evaluate their influence, credibility, and support for Monsanto on various issues.

§

The DPA believes that the company violated the provisions of the GDPR by not informing the data subjects that their data was stored in this file. In addition, the CNIL complained that the company had not given the contractual guarantees that should normally regulate the relationship with a subcontractor. The creation of contact files by stakeholders for lobbying purposes is not illegal in itself. However, CNIL stressed that data subjects nevertheless have the right to be informed of the existence of the file in order to exercise additional rights, in particular the right to object. In addition, the CNIL found that the data collection was carried out by a provider contracted by Monsanto and that Monsanto violated Article 28 of the General Data Protection Regulation by not including in its contracts with the data processor the provisions foreseen in the GDPR, in particular regarding data security. GDPR Articles: Art. 14 GDPR, Art. 28 GDPR Industry: Industry and Commerce

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision
C-203/22 CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien In Case C-203/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 15(1)(h) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien… CJEU ·First Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… CJEU ·Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Supervision
C-579/21 Proceedings brought by J.M In Case C-579/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Itä-Suomen hallinto-oikeus (Administrative Court of Eastern Finland)… CJEU ·First Chamber Jun 22, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction