Skip to content
Enforcement · Austrian Data Protection Authority (dsb) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Unser Ö-Bonus Club GmbH: Insufficient legal basis for data processing

The Austrian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 2,000,000 on Rewe affiliate Ö-Bonus Club GmbH.

€500,000 Fine
Unser Ö-Bonus Club GmbH
AUSTRIA
Art. 6 GDPR Art. 7 GDPR Art. 12 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Austrian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 2,000,000 on Rewe affiliate Ö-Bonus Club GmbH. When signing up for the customer loyalty program jö Bonus Club, the controller is said to have failed to properly explain that customers' data and shopping behavior are used to create individual profiles, and that the information is also passed on to partner companies. According to the GDPR, the clarification must be easily accessible and in simple language. However, the controller had designed the registration for the jö Bonus Club in such a way that the clarification about profiling could only be found after scrolling down. However, the consent was placed higher up, so in all cases the consents were obtained before the clarification. In turn, on the physical flyers, the signature box placed at the bottom of the form appeared as if it were a confirmation of enrollment in the club, even though it constituted consent to profiling as well.

§

The DPA concluded that the controller breached its duty to provide consent in an understandable and easily accessible form in clear and simple language. Accordingly, it deemed the consents to be invalid and the profiling carried out on their basis to be unlawful. - UPDATE - The controller appealed the decision to the Austrian Federal Administrative Court, which reduced the original fine of EUR 2,000,000 to a total sum of EUR 500,000 GDPR Articles: Art. 6 GDPR, Art. 7 GDPR, Art. 12 GPDR Industry: Industry and Commerce

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
W256 2227693-1 Austrian FAC: DPA rightly found loyalty program consent for profiling invalid under GDPR On 05.09.2019, the Austrian DPA (DSB) notified the controller of a customer loyalty program that they were initiating an ex officio investigation. The controller responded by… Federal Administrative Court Sep 28, 2023 Marketing Profiling Automated Decision-Making
C-203/22 CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien In Case C-203/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 15(1)(h) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien… CJEU ·First Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
C-634/21 OQ v Land Hessen In Case C-634/21, the CJEU addressed a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning OQ's challenge against Land Hessen's refusal to order SCHUFA Holding AG… CJEU ·First Chamber Dec 7, 2023 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse) Artikelen: 5(1)(c), 6(1), en 21 AVG Onderwerp : Beginsel van minimale gegevensverwerking Gek genoeg verwijst het HvJ EU zelf niet naar HvJ EU 1 augustus 2022, C‑184/20… HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse). ·CJEU Jan 9, 2025 IP Address Retention Period Identification
C-422/24 Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik. A new page has been created with the following information: "" CJEU Jan 7, 2026 Personal Data Fairness & Transparency Controllers
C-154/21 RW v Österreichische Post AG The Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber), in response to a preliminary reference from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court), interpreted Article… CJEU ·First Chamber Jan 12, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Recipient