Skip to content
Enforcement · Norwegian Supervisory Authority (Datatilsynet) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Grindr LLC: Insufficient legal basis for data processing

The Norwegian DPA has fined Grindr LLC EUR 6.3 million.

€6,300,000 Fine
Grindr LLC
NORWAY
Art. 6 GDPR Art. 9 GDPR

Full text 2 findings

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Norwegian DPA has fined Grindr LLC EUR 6.3 million. Grindr is a location-based social networking app designed for gay, bi, trans and queer people. In 2020, the Norwegian Consumer Protection Authority filed a complaint against Grindr with the Norwegian DPA, alleging that the portal had shared information about users' GPS location, IP address, cell phone advertising ID, age and gender with several third parties for marketing purposes. Under GDPR, consent is required for the sharing of this personal data. However, during its investigation, the DPA found that the consent collected by Grindr was not valid. Users had to accept the privacy policy in order to use the app, but were not explicitly asked whether they would consent to their data being shared with third parties for marketing purposes. In addition, the information about the disclosure of personal data was not clear or accessible enough for users.

§

The DPA points out that this type of data may identify a Grindr user as a member of a sexual minority. Grindr users would sometimes want to use the app anonymously without, for example, giving their full name or uploading a photo of themselves. With the sexual orientation of the users, a special category of personal data, which is subject to a particularly high level of protection, was therefore also affected. The DPA therefore considers the infringement to be a particularly serious case that justifies a deterrent high fine. Business models based on behavior-based marketing are widespread in the digital economy, making it important that the fines for GDPR violations are deterrent. ---UPDATE--- The Norwegian Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the DPA to issue the fine. GDPR Articles: Art. 6 (1) GDPR, Art. 9 (1) GDPR Industry: Media, Telecoms and Broadcasting

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision
C-507/17 Google LLC v CNIL C-507/17 (Google Territorial Scope) CJEU Sep 24, 2019 Territorial scope (GDPR) Right to be Forgotten Direct Marketing
Guidelines 05/2020 consent under Regulation 2016/679 Guidelines on consent Guidelines ·EDPB May 4, 2020 Consent Data Portability Personal Data
CJEU Bavarian Lager: Disclosing personal data in access-to-documents requests is Processing: Communication of personal data in response to a request for access to documents constitutes processing. (¶69) Jun 29, 2010 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Right to Restriction
C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) Het Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste Kamer) beantwoordt een prejudiciële vraag over de uitleg van artikel 13 van Richtlijn 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy) en de verhouding tot de GDPR,… CJEU Mar 27, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Marketing