Enforcement · Romanian National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing (ANSPDCP) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Wabag Water Services SRL: Insufficient legal basis for data processing
The Romanian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 1,000 on SC Wabag Water Services SRL.
Full text
The Romanian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 1,000 on SC Wabag Water Services SRL. An employee of the company had filed a complaint with the DPA due to the fact that their employer had processed their personal data without their consent for the purpose of registering and booking a Covid-19 vaccination appointment.
Industry: Employment
How it connects
Related across sources
C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14 (Schrems I) CJEU Oct 6, 2015 Privacy Shield Supervision IP Address
Opinion 18/2018 draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Portugal regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR) Opinion ·EDPB Oct 3, 2018 DPIA Supervision Supervisory Authorities
Opinion 13/2018 draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Lithuania regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR) Opinion ·EDPB Oct 3, 2018 DPIA Supervision Supervisory Authorities
Opinion 21/2018 draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Slovakia regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR) Opinion ·EDPB Oct 3, 2018 DPIA Supervision Supervisory Authorities
2 A 165/24 OVG Saarlouis - 2 A 165/24 The data subject was an employee, the controller was the employer. On 14 January 2022, the data subject requested access to personal data from the controller under Article 15… May 13, 2025 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data