Enforcement · Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and the Freedom of Information (NAIH) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

AMPLIFON Hungary Trade and Service Provider LLC: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

The Hungarian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 197,000 on AMPLIFON Hungary Trade and Service Provider LLC.

€197,000 Fine
AMPLIFON Hungary Trade and Service Provider LLC
HUNGARY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR Art. 12 GDPR Art. 14 GDPR
Personal Data Consent Supervisory Authorities Processing Scientific Research
Aug 11, 2022 Source naih.hu

Full text

The Hungarian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 197,000 on AMPLIFON Hungary Trade and Service Provider LLC. The DPA had received complaints from several data subjects for having received unsolicited invitations to a hearing screening. During its investigation, the DPA found that the company had contacted the data subjects without first obtaining their consent. The company had received the data from the Ministry of the Interior for market research purposes. The DPA found that the company had processed the data unlawfully and contrary to the original purpose for market research. In addition, the DPA found that the company had not provided the data subjects with sufficient information on the data processing.

Industry: Industry and Commerce

How it connects

References

All 7

Related across sources

C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities IP Address Supervision
C-40/17 Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV C-40/17 (Fashion ID) CJEU Jul 29, 2019 Controllers Legitimate Interest Processors
C-434/16 Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner C-434/16 (Nowak) CJEU Dec 20, 2017 Right of Access Personal Data Right to be Forgotten
C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14 (Schrems I) CJEU Oct 6, 2015 Privacy Shield Supervision IP Address
CJEU: Processing of beneficiary data not based on consent; individuals must be informed Purpose for processing: The legislation at issue does base the processing on consent. Rather, it provides that they are to be informed. Thus, processing is not based on their… Nov 9, 2010 Consent Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
Related documents