Enforcement · Romanian National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing (ANSPDCP) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
REGENCY COMPANY SRL: Non-compliance with general data processing principles
The Romanian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 3,000 on REGENCY COMPANY SRL.
Full text
The Romanian DPA has imposed a fine of EUR 3,000 on REGENCY COMPANY SRL. The controller had installed video surveillance cameras in its premises for the purpose of monitoring access of people and security of premises and property. However, this allowed it to monitor its employees extensively. In the course of its investigation, the DPA found that the video surveillance was partly carried out without the consent of the employees and that the purposes underlying the surveillance could also be achieved by means less intrusive into the privacy of the employees.
Industry: Employment
How it connects
Related across sources
C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14 (Schrems I) CJEU Oct 6, 2015 Privacy Shield Supervision IP Address
Guidelines 3/2019 processing of personal data through video devices Guidelines ·EDPB Jan 30, 2020 Personal Data Processing Material scope (GDPR)
C-604/22 IAB Europe v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In Case C-604/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal in proceedings between IAB Europe and the Belgian… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Mar 7, 2024 IP Address Controllers Personal Data
10 A 5144/23 VG Hannover: Controller appeals DPA reprimand over unlawful workplace video surveillance The owner of a doner kebab production facility (the controller) had installed video cameras to monitor virtually every room of the business premises. Cameras were placed in the… Administrative Court Hannover Aug 7, 2026 Controllers Supervisory Authorities Legitimate Interest
Opinion 34/2025 C.E.C.L certification criteria ·Opinion ·EDPB Dec 2, 2025 Certification Supervision Supervisory Authorities
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data