Enforcement · Data Protection Authority of Sweden (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Schockholm School borard: Non-compliance with general data processing principles

€70,000 Fine
Schockholm School borard
SWEDEN
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 6 GDPR Art. 13 GDPR
Video Surveillance Monitoring Audit Logs Education IP Address Public Authority Supervisory Authorities Public Sector
Oct 3, 2023 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement EDPB Guidance Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR EDPB Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Hungary: Introduction to the GDPR Application and a Brief History of Data Protection European Data Protection Law Review Case Law Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein CJEU Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Netherlands: The GDPR Implementation Act European Data Protection Law Review Literature GDPR Implementation Series ∙ Romania: Overview of the GDPR Implementation European Data Protection Law Review

Full text

The Swedish DPA has fined the Stockholm School Board EUR 70,000 for excessive video surveillance in a school. A school had installed extensive video surveillance due to past problems with incendiary crimes. During its investigation, the DPA found that there were about 50 fixed cameras in the school monitoring hallways, stairwells and corridors in conjunction with doors, toilets and student lockers. Surveillance was taking place 24/7 with image recording. The DPA concluded that video surveillance for the purpose of preventing incendiary crimes is generally permissible, but that the area covered by the cameras must be limited to the absolute necessary areas. According to the DPA, the video surveillance in the school was too wide and not all cameras were necessary to monitor potential fire hazards.

Industry: Public Sector and Education

Original document at the source www.imy.se

Similar Content