Skip to content
News
EN

ΔΔΚ - 1181/18

GDPRhub

Content

A university lecturer (the complainant) requested access to the content of evaluation reports from independent reviewers and recommendation letters that were prepared during the doctoral promotion process at the University of Cyprus (the respondent).

The respondent refused access during the ongoing promotion process, citing their internal regulations and the long-standing academic practice that requires the confidentiality and anonymity of external reviewers to ensure objectivity and impartiality. However, they indicated that access could be granted after the completion of the process, with the identities of the reviewers removed.

The respondent refused access during the ongoing promotion process, citing their [https://www.ucy.ac.cy/legislation/wp-content/


This content has been automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.


This content was automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.