News · GDPRhub EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

ΔΔΚ - 1181/18

Education Professional Secrecy Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Controllers
Jan 12, 2026
Summary

A university lecturer (the complainant) has requested access to the content of evaluation reports from independent reviewers and letters of recommendation that were prepared during the doctoral promotion process, from the University of Cyprus (the responsible party). A university lecturer (the complainant) has requested access to the content of evaluation reports from independent reviewers and letters of recommendation that were prepared during the doctoral promotion process, from the University of Cyprus (the responsible party).

How it connects

Related across sources

Enforcement Handelskamer, Industrie, Dienstverlening en Transport van Spanje: Onvoldoende juridische basis voor de verwerking van gegevens. Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd) Enforcement Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Services and Navigation of Spain: Insufficient legal basis for data processing Spanish Data Protection Authority (aepd) Guidance Guidelines 03/2021 on the application of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR EDPB Guidance Guidelines 02/2021 on virtual voice assistants EDPB Guidance Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR EDPB Enforcement Krajowa Szkoła Sądownictwa i Prokuratury: Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security Polish National Personal Data Protection Office (UODO)

Full text

A university lecturer (the complainant) requested access to the content of evaluation reports from independent reviewers and recommendation letters that were prepared during the doctoral promotion process at the University of Cyprus (the respondent). The respondent refused access during the ongoing promotion process, citing their internal regulations and the long-standing academic practice that requires the confidentiality and anonymity of external reviewers to ensure objectivity and impartiality. However, they indicated that access could be granted after the completion of the process, with the identities of the reviewers removed. The respondent refused access during the ongoing promotion process, citing their [https://www.ucy.ac.cy/legislation/wp-content/ --- This content has been automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language. --- This content was automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.

Similar Content