OGH - 6Ob189/24y

|Initial contributor=|Initial contributor= || }}}} The Supreme Court has ruled that Meta must provide its users with full access to all personal data, including the sources, recipients, and purposes; a simple list is not sufficient. Furthermore, the court has determined that personalized advertising and the processing of (sensitive) personal data from third-party websites require the explicit consent of the individual. The Austrian Supreme Court has ruled that Meta must provide users with full access to all personal data, including the sources, recipients, and purposes, within 14 days, and that personalized advertising and the processing of sensitive data require explicit consent according to the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). Meta cannot evade these obligations by claiming that there are technical limitations.

== Summary in English ==
== Summary in English == The plaintiff alleged that Meta illegally processed his personal and sensitive data, refused to grant full access to all personal data upon request, and collected personal data from users through social plugins, third-party apps, and...

This content has been automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.

This content was automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.