RVS - 202203874/1/A3

|Initial_Contributor=lde|Initial_Contributor=lde || }}}}A court held that the DPA insufficiently justified its rejection of a complaint against a cinema that no longer accepted cash payments. According to the court, the DPA failed to assess whether the mandatory card payments pursued a sufficiently concrete and justified purpose under the GDPR. A court held that the DPA insufficiently justified its refusal to act against a cinema that no longer accepted cash payments, failing to demonstrate that mandatory card payments pursued a sufficiently concrete and justified purpose under the GDPR. == English Summary ==== English Summary ==