BGH - V ZB 90/25

}}}} The Supreme Court held that a court could lawfully grant prospective bidders access to compulsory auction files on the basis of [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] without first redacting the personal data they contain.The Federal Court of Justice held that a court could lawfully grant prospective bidders access to compulsory auction files on the basis of [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] without first redacting the personal data they contain. == English Summary ==== English Summary == A prospective bidder in a compulsory auction wanted to find out who owned the property being sold and filed a request to inspect certain files with a court (the controller). The court of first instance granted them access to the files on the condition that the names and addresses of involved parties mentioned in the files (the data subjects) as well as previously deleted land register entries would be redacted from the document. A prospective bidder in a compulsory auction wanted to