Skip to content
News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Cell phone not personal enough for GDPR protection?!

How it connects

Full text

Contradictory decision from the Austrian Federal Administrative Court (BVwG): Cell phone traffic and location data are particularly sensitive data that require additional protection, but at the same time they are not personal data at all. According to the BVwG, the mobile phone provider A1 may refuse to provide information about traffic and location data, as this data is particularly sensitive and there would be no way to prove that a cell phone was not used by other people. noyb will file an appeal. Decision by the BVwG Complaint before DSB. Ever since A1 Telekom Austria provided cell phone user’s movement data to the government during the Corona pandemic, many users have wanted to know which location data was collected and stored on them. When a user submitted an access request, A1 refused to provide information about traffic and location data because the user could not sufficiently prove that he was the sole user of the phone number/SIM card. According to A1, it was therefore unclea

Similar Content