News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

GDPR Rights in Sweden: Court confirms that authority must investigate complaints.

Right of Access Procedures Consent Supervisory Authorities Voluntary Own-Initiative Investigations
Nov 9, 2022 Source

How it connects

References

Related across sources

Enforcement Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - TSV/4630/2023 Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) Enforcement CNIL fines energy supplier for mishandling data subject access and objection requests CNIL (France) Case Law Rb. Noord-Holland - C/15/376188 District Court Noord-Holland Literature Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi di Era Globalisasi Digital: Studi Perbandingan General Data Protection Regulation Uni Eropa dengan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi Indonesia As-Syar i Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Case Law Sibiu Tribunal: CNCF denied CCTV access request; court rules on immaterial damage claim Sibiu Tribunal Case Law AG Arnsberg - 42 C 434/23 Local Court Arnsberg

Full text

Forced Consent & Consent Bypass GDPR Rights in Sweden: Court confirms that authority must investigate complaints. So far, the Swedish IMY has taken the view that users don’t have party rights in GDPR procedures. The Stockholm administrative court held that a complainant under Article 77 GDPR has the right to request a decision from the Swedish Data Protection Authority (IMY) after six months. So far, the IMY took the view that users are not a party in procedures concerning their own GDPR rights. The right to get a decision within six months also applies if the IMY opens a parallel ex officio investigation into the same company. Read the full GDPRhub summary on the decision One month according to the GDPR turns into three years in reality. In January 2019, a user filed a complaint with the Austrian DSB in response to Spotify’s insufficient answer to his access request. The complaint was forwarded to the Swedish IMY, which is responsible for Spotify. Since then, the case has not been dec

Original document at the source noyb.eu

Similar Content