News · Electronic Frontier Foundation EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Court Records Should Be Free

Accountability
Jun 18, 2026 Source

How it connects

Related across sources

Enforcement AEPD fines El Español for disclosing minor's identity in assault video AEPD (Spain) Enforcement HDPA (Greece) 33/2020 — Employee's access and erasure claims against the American College HDPA (Greece) Case Law CJEU - C‑474/24 - NADA Austria and Others GDPRhub Enforcement Italian DPA: Enna Health Authority violated GDPR by publishing judicial data Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) Tools CNIL record of processing activities template CNIL Tools ICO documentation templates (records of processing, Article 30) ICO

Full text

Court records belong to the public. Yet anyone seeking access to federal court filings through PACER, a government software system that stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, is usually required to pay hefty fees to search for and view documents. PACER’s fees have long acted as a barrier that makes it hard, especially for low income people, to see and understand the work produced by our own public servants. That's why EFF joined a broad group of organizations supporting the Open Courts Act of 2026, legislation that would modernize the federal courts' electronic filing systems and eliminate PACER fees. Public access to the courts is a cornerstone of democratic accountability. The bill would replace the aging PACER and CM/ECF systems with a modern, unified platform designed to improve public access, strengthen cybersecurity, and reduce long-term costs. Supporters note that PACER currently collects more than $150 million annually in fees from the public, despite court recor

Original document at the source www.eff.org

Similar Content