OLG Wien - 11R86/25k

Added links to CJEU cases === Holding ====== Holding === The court referred to the CJEU judgment in Case C-132/21 and ruled that it was permissible to pursue in parallel dual legal remedies, at least until a final decision has been issued.The court referred to the CJEU judgment in [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:62021CJ0132 Case C-132/21] and ruled that it was permissible to pursue in parallel dual legal remedies, at least until a final decision has been issued. The court confirmed that an access request under [[Article 15 GDPR|Article 15 GDPR]] is not abusive where it serves a legitimate purpose within the meaning of Recital 63 GDPR. It cited CJEU C-307/22 and held that an access request may legitimately be used to obtain evidence for litigation. The court confirmed that an access request under [[Article 15 GDPR]] is not abusive where it serves a legitimate purpose within the meaning of Recital 63 GDPR. It cited [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TX