Laws · GDPR ·art-82-par-1 EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Full text
Any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of an infringement of this Regulation shall have the right to receive compensation from the controller or processor for the damage suffered.
How it connects
Cited by
- LAG Schleswig-Holstein - 6 Ta 49/22
- UI v Österreichische Post AG
- VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite
- SO Warszawa - III C 904/23
- BGH - VI ZR 375/2
All 32
- UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.27.2023
- The Court of Justice on the Excessiveness of Access Requests under the GDPR
- AG Arnsberg - 42 C 434/23
- CJEU - C-526/24 - Brillen Rottler
- SG Nürnberg: MOVEit zero-day cyberattack via processor did not breach Art. 32 GDPR
- German Supreme Court: GDPR non-material damages need no severity threshold
- EWHC (UK) - Johnson v Eastlight Community Homes Ltd
- IP v Quirin Privatbank AG
- MK v K GmbH
- Agentsia po vpisvaniyata v OL
- A v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
- ND v DR
- AT and BT v PS GbR and Others
- JU and SO v Scalable Capital GmbH
- GP v juris GmbH
- BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH
- ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts
- VX and AT v Gemeinde Ummendorf
- CA - EWCA Civ 899 Vince v. Associated Newspapers Limited
- BVerfG: Goslar Local Court violated right to lawful judge by denying CJEU referral in
- OLG München - 36 U 1054/25 e
- BGH - VI ZR 97/22
- UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.5.2025
- Sibiu Tribunal: rail company liable for refusal of CCTV access request
- LAG Köln - 6 SLa 116/26
- High Court rules on burden of proof and pleading duties in ICCL v Microsoft GDPR
- Brillen Rottler GmbH & Co. KG v TC
Related across sources
C-741/21 GP v juris GmbH In Case C-741/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) addressed a preliminary reference from the Landgericht Saarbrücken in proceedings between data subject… CJEU ·Third Chamber Apr 11, 2024 Liability Personal Data Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-507/23 A v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs The Court of Justice of the European Union issued a preliminary ruling on a reference from the Latvian Supreme Court in Case C-507/23, involving an individual ("A") and the… CJEU ·Eighth Chamber Oct 4, 2024 Liability Personal Data Controllers
C-687/21 BL v MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH In Case C-687/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Articles 5, 24, 32, and 82 of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling request from the Amtsgericht… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 25, 2024 Liability Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Personal Data
S 5 SF 65/24 DS SG Nürnberg: MOVEit zero-day cyberattack via processor did not breach Art. 32 GDPR The data subject (a child born in 2018), represented by her parents, was insured with the controller (a statutory health insurance provider) and participated in its digital bonus… Social Court Nuremberg Jun 10, 2026 Processors Controllers Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-182/22 JU and SO v Scalable Capital GmbH In Joined Cases C-182/22 and C-189/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Amtsgericht München concerning the… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jun 20, 2024 Liability Data Breaches Personal Data
C-340/21 VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite C-340/21 (VB v Natsionalna agentsia) CJEU Dec 14, 2023 Data Breaches Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Notification Obligation