Skip to content
Case Law · Court of Justice of the European Union EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Judgment

Full text

Provisional text JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 4 September 2025 (*) ( Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of the grant of a ‘prohibitory injunction’ ) In Case C‑655/23, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice, Germany), made by decision of 26 September 2023, received at the Court on 7 November 2023, in the proceedings IP v Quirin Privatbank AG, THE COURT (Fourth Chamber), composed of I. Jarukaitis, President of the Chamber, N. Jääskinen (Rapporteur), A. Arabadjiev, M. Condinanzi and R. Frendo, Judges, Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, Registrar: A. Calot Escobar, having regard to the written procedure, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of: – IP, by M. Rodenhausen, Rechtsanwältin, – Quirin Privatbank AG, by F. Buchmann, Rechtsanwalt, – the European Commission, by A. Bouchagiar and M. Heller, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 20 March 2025, gives the following Judgment

How it connects