News · noyb - European Center for Digital Rights EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Ranking: Who in the EU Parliament fights for your privacy – and who for Big Tech?!

GDPR Policy If the European Commission and the EU Member States have their way, the so-called Digital Omnibus will result in a fundamental change to EU privacy laws.

Cookies Direct Marketing Telecommunications
Oct 12, 2026 Source noyb.eu

Full text

GDPR Policy If the European Commission and the EU Member States have their way, the so-called Digital Omnibus will result in a fundamental change to EU privacy laws. But what about the European Parliament? To find out more, noyb has analysed more than 1,000 amendments that Members of Parliament (MEPs) have tabled for the GDPR and ePrivacy Directive to shed a light on their actions. This shows that many MEPs are in favour of stripping people of their privacy rights – while others still push back. Go to gdpr-omnibus.eu to see who tries to defend your privacy and who wants to undermine currently existing protections. Look up your MEP by country and political group. Find out who wants to reduce your privacy! Eliminating protections instead of providing simplification. The European Union is currently in the process of changing its core privacy laws via the so-called Digital Omnibus. Officially, this reform package is supposed to bring simplification for EU businesses while maintaining the G

How it connects

Related across sources

C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Romanian Curtea de Apel Bucureşti in proceedings between Inteligo Media SA and the Romanian… CJEU ·First Chamber Nov 13, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Legitimate Interest
C-654/23 Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP) Het Hof van Justitie van de EU (Eerste Kamer) beantwoordt een prejudiciële vraag over de uitleg van artikel 13 van Richtlijn 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy) en de verhouding tot de GDPR,… CJEU Mar 27, 2025 Telecommunications Personal Data Marketing
C-129/21 Proximus NV v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In a preliminary ruling requested by the Brussels Court of Appeal, the Court of Justice of the European Union addressed the interpretation of Article 12 of Directive 2002/58/EC… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 27, 2022 Right to be Forgotten Telecommunications Personal Data
C-119/12 Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 22 November 2012.#Josef Probst v mr.nexnet GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Electronic communications — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 6(2) and (5) — Processing of personal data — Traffic data necessary for billing and debt collection — Debt collection by a third company — Persons acting under the authority of the providers of public communications networks and electronic communications services.#Case C‑119/12. In Case C-119/12, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 6(2) and (5) of Directive 2002/58/EC (the ePrivacy Directive) in proceedings between Josef Probst… CJEU Nov 22, 2012 Personal Data Processing Telecommunications
rec 173 Recital 173 — Relationship with ePrivacy Directive Apr 27, 2016 Cookies Direct Marketing Telecommunications
Opinion 5/2019 interplay between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, in particular regarding the competence, tasks and powers of data protection authorities Opinion ·EDPB Mar 12, 2019 Supervisory Authorities Telecommunications Supervision
Related documents