Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
CJEU: ISP filtering injunction violates data protection, privacy and free expression
Original title: SCARLET EXTENDED SA V. SOCIETE BELGE DES AUTEURS, COMPOSITEURS ET EDITEURS SCRL (SABAM), 24.Nov.2011 (“SCARLET”)
Judgment
Summary
Necessity/proportionality: Requiring ISPs to install a system for filtering electronic communications would be incompatible with EU Directives, namely with Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31, which prohibits imposition of an obligation on an Internet service provider to carry out general monitoring of the information that it transmits on its network, and would be against the fundamental rights of Internet users to the protection of their personal data and freedom of expression guaranteed under t
Full text
summary
Necessity/proportionality: Requiring ISPs to install a system for filtering electronic communications would be incompatible with EU Directives, namely with Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31, which prohibits imposition of an obligation on an Internet service provider to carry out general monitoring of the information that it transmits on its network, and would be against the fundamental rights of Internet users to the protection of their personal data and freedom of expression guaranteed under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. (¶ 53)
¶53 excerpt
Consequently, it must be held that, in adopting the injunction requiring the ISP to install the contested filtering system, the national court concerned would not be respecting the requirement that a fair balance be struck between the right to intellectual property, on the one hand, and the freedom to conduct business, the right to protection of personal data and the freedom to receive or impart information, on the other.
How it connects
Related across sources
Recommendations 02/2020 European Essential Guarantees for surveillance measures Recommendations ·EDPB Nov 10, 2020 Monitoring Privacy Shield International Transfer
Opinion 2/2026 EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework ( EDPB, EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Opinion Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Notification Obligation Data Breaches
Opinion 5/2019 interplay between the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, in particular regarding the competence, tasks and powers of data protection authorities Opinion ·EDPB Mar 12, 2019 Telecommunications Material scope (GDPR) Supervision
Opinion 2/2026 Proposal for a Directive amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision EDPB - EDPS JOINT OPINION 2 /2026 On the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (Digital Omnibus) Adopted on 1 0 February… Opinion ·EDPS Feb 11, 2026 Notified Body Reporting and Notification Obligations Direct Marketing Data Breaches
2025 EDPB Annual Report 2024 De EDPB heeft het Jaarraport van 2024 gepubliceerd. Met ook een handzame samenvatting voor degene die geen tijd hebben. Er wordt ook een lijst met zaken van enkele DPAs… Apr 23, 2025 Direct Marketing Legitimate Interest Privacy by Design
Guidelines 8/2020 targeting of social media users Guidelines ·EDPB Apr 13, 2021 Marketing IP Address Transparency