News·GDPRhubEN
Export
VG Berlin - 42 K 72/25
Full text
Machine translation of the decision, via GDPRhub — not the official text.
A court dismissed the controller's challenge against a DPA warning for violating Articles 5(1)(d), 12(1) and 15 GDPR by reporting inaccurate employee data and failing to provide complete access to personal data in time.A court upheld a DPA’s warning concerning a fire brigade which inaccurately claimed that one of its employees had direct contact with vulnerable groups in connection with a covid-related notification form. Further, the fire brigade failed to provide complete access to the employee’s personal data. English Summary. English Summary
How it connects
Related across sources
2 A 165/24 OVG Saarlouis - 2 A 165/24 The data subject was an employee, the controller was the employer. On 14 January 2022, the data subject requested access to personal data from the controller under Article 15… May 13, 2025 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14 (Schrems I) CJEU Oct 6, 2015 Privacy Shield International Transfer Supervision
Guidelines 01/2022 data subject rights - Right of access Guidelines ·EDPB Apr 17, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Rectification
T-318/24 GC T-318/24: EPSO access logs and Article 17 access requests under Regulation 2018/1725 An applicant (the data subject) participated in several EU staff selection procedures administered by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), acting as controller, and… General Court Dec 3, 2025 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Restriction
Opinion 34/2025 C.E.C.L certification criteria ·Opinion ·EDPB Dec 2, 2025 Certification Supervision Supervisory Authorities
C-272/19 VQ v Land Hessen In a preliminary ruling requested by the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden in proceedings between VQ and Land Hessen, the CJEU addressed whether the GDPR applies to the processing of… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jul 9, 2020 Material scope (GDPR) Personal Data Right of Access