Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
FASHION ID GmbH & Co. KG v. VERBRAUCHERZENTRALE NRW eV
Summary
Representation of data subjects: Articles 22 to 24 of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as “not precluding national legislation which allows consumer-protection associations to bring or defend legal proceedings against a person allegedly responsible for an infringement of the protection of personal data.” (¶63)
How it connects
Related across sources
Literature Beyond GDPR: The Architectural Challenge of Data Sovereignty and Confidential Computing in the Post-2024 Era News ANSPDCP (Romania) - ANSPDCP (Romania) - Fine against Poliserv JG (PJG) SRL News Datatilsynet (Norway) - 23/00435-62 News Uber krijgt boete van bijna 825 miljoen euro voor geautomatiseerd blokkeren van chauffeurs News ICO (UK) - ACRO Criminal Records Office News AP adviseert Twitch-gebruikers: zet instellingen uit voor delen van data met Amazon AI
Full text
summary
Representation of data subjects: Articles 22 to 24 of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as “not precluding national legislation which allows consumer-protection associations to bring or defend legal proceedings against a person allegedly responsible for an infringement of the protection of personal data.” (¶63)
¶63 excerpt
In the light of all the findings above, the answer to the first question is that Articles 22 to 24 of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which allows consumer-protection associations to bring or defend legal proceedings against a person allegedly responsible for an infringement of the protection of personal data.
Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu