Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
PROMUSICAE, 29.Jan.2008 (“PROMUSICAE”)
Summary
Personal Data: Names and physical addresses of certain users of an internet service, whose IP address and date and time of connection were know, are personal data, that is, information relating to identified or identifiable natural persons. (¶¶ 30&45)
How it connects
Related across sources
Enforcement NAIH fines online store HUF 2M for unclear and incomplete privacy notice Enforcement Italian DPA sanctions Lusha Systems for processing contact data without consent in B2B Enforcement NAIH fines online store HUF 15M for transparency and Article 12(1) GDPR violations Enforcement Austrian DSB rules 360-degree feedback unlawful without specific works agreement Enforcement DSB Austria: No fine imposed on COVID mask shop for cookie consent failure Enforcement Telecommunications operator (operator of electronic communications networks and services): Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Full text
summary
Personal Data: Names and physical addresses of certain users of an internet service, whose IP address and date and time of connection were know, are personal data, that is, information relating to identified or identifiable natural persons. (¶¶ 30&45)
¶30 excerpt
Promusicae asked for Telefónica to be ordered to disclose the identities and physical addresses of certain persons whom it provided with internet access services, whose IP address and date and time of connection were known. According to Promusicae, those persons used the KaZaA file exchange program (peer-to-peer or P2P) and provided access in shared files of personal computers to phonograms in which the members of Promusicae held the exploitation rights.
¶45 excerpt
It is not disputed that the communication sought by Promusicae of the names and addresses of certain users of KaZaA involves the making available of personal data, that is, information relating to identified or identifiable natural persons, in accordance with the definition in Article 2(a) of Directive 95/46 (see, to that effect, Case C‑101/01 Lindqvist [2003] ECR I‑12971, paragraph 24). That communication of information which, as Promusicae submits and Telefónica does not contest, is stored by Telefónica constitutes the processing of personal data within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 2 of Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46. It must therefore be accepted that that communication falls within the scope of Directive 2002/58, although the compliance of the data storage itself with the requirements of that directive is not at issue in the main proceedings.
Original document at the source eur-lex.europa.eu