DSA Recital 48 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 48 — very large platforms transparency requirements

Transparency VLOP/VLSE Framework DSA Terms and Conditions Requirements
In force — consolidated2022-10-27 · CELEX 02022R2065-20221027 · ELI ↗
Version history 1
  • 2022-10-27in force CELEX 02022R2065-20221027

Given their special role and reach, it is appropriate to impose on very large online platforms and very large online search engines additional requirements regarding information and transparency of their terms and conditions. Consequently, providers of very large online platforms and very large online search engines should provide their terms and conditions in the official languages of all Member States in which they offer their services and should also provide recipients of the services with a concise and easily readable summary of the main elements of the terms and conditions. Such summaries should identify the main elements of the information requirements, including the possibility of easily opting out from optional clauses.

Related across sources

Hugging Face CEO: Advanced AI models require new transparency mandates “I think there’s a lot to do around how to create better disclosures,” Clem Delangue said. Sep 16, 2026 Transparency
2025 Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) Guidelines on transparency EDPB Transparency Personal Data Information Provision Modalities and Communication Methods
2018 Article 29 Working Party - Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679 EDPB Apr 11, 2018 Transparency Fairness & Transparency Personal Data
CJEU: Transparency has no automatic priority over data protection; access to expert info Necessity/proportionality: No automatic priority can be conferred on the objective of transparency over the right to protection of personal data.Where obtaining the information… Jul 16, 2015 Transparency Fairness & Transparency Personal Data
200.256.426 Court rejects DFW request for Ziggo customer IP addresses due to insufficient transparency DFW (a Dutch movie distributor) applies a protocol to its processing of personal data which was approved by the Dutch DPA before the GDPR came into force. DFW asked Ziggo (an… Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden Nov 5, 2019 Personal Data Consent Transparency
2018 Transparency EDPB May 25, 2018 Transparency