AI Act (NL) Recital 30 NL
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 30 — verbod biometrische categorisering gevoelige kenmerken

Special Categories of Data Biometric Data Political Opinions Types of Special Categories of Personal Data Biometric Data Personal Data
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

Systemen voor biometrische categorisering die gebaseerd zijn op biometrische gegevens van natuurlijke personen, zoals het gezicht of vingerafdrukken, om de politieke opvattingen, het lidmaatschap van een vakbond, religieuze of levensbeschouwelijke overtuigingen, ras, seksleven of seksuele gerichtheid van een persoon af te leiden of te infereren, moeten worden verboden. Dat verbod mag geen betrekking hebben op het rechtmatig labelen, filteren of categoriseren van reeksen biometrische gegevens die in overeenstemming met het Unierecht of het nationale recht met betrekking tot biometrische gegevens zijn verkregen, zoals het sorteren van beelden op basis van haar- of oogkleur, die bijvoorbeeld op het gebied van rechtshandhaving kunnen worden gebruikt.

Related across sources

Enforcement AEPD investigates University of Navarra over student COVID-19 vaccination status requests Case Law Supreme Court upholds €300,000 fine against INPS for GDPR violations in COVID bonus data Case Law Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#MK v K GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6 Case Law Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data processed when drawing up a COVID-19 certificate – Data not collected from the data subject – Information to be provided – Exception to the obligation t Case Law Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Online social networks – General terms of use relating to contracts concluded between a digital platform and a user – Personalised advertising – Article 5(1)(b) – Principle of purpos Case Law Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 December 2023.#OQ v Land Hessen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 22 – Automated individual decision-making – Credit information agencies – Automated establishment of a probability value concerning the ability of a person to meet payment commitments in the future (‘s