AI Act (NL) Recital 94 NL
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 94 — biometrische verwerking rechtshandhaving

Biometric Data Identification Types of Special Categories of Personal Data Retention Period Transparency Storage Limitation Personal Data
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

Elke vorm van verwerking van biometrische gegevens voor rechtshandhavingsdoeleinden door AI-systemen voor biometrische identificatie, moet in overeenstemming zijn met artikel 10 van Richtlijn (EU) 2016/680, op grond waarvan verwerking uitsluitend is toegestaan indien die strikt noodzakelijk is, in welk geval er passende waarborgen voor de rechten en vrijheden van de betrokkene moeten worden geboden, alsmede indien het Unierecht of het lidstatelijk recht in een dergelijke verwerking voorziet. Een dergelijk gebruik moet, indien toegestaan, tevens voldoen aan de beginselen van artikel 4, lid 1, van Richtlijn (EU) 2016/680, waaronder rechtmatigheid, billijkheid en transparantie, doelbinding, nauwkeurigheid en opslagbeperking.

Related across sources

C-446/21 Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited In a preliminary ruling arising from proceedings between Maximilian Schrems and Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted GDPR… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Oct 4, 2024 Retention Period Personal Data Marketing
C-60/22 UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland In Case C-60/22, the CJEU (Fifth Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning UZ, a third-country national, and the Bundesrepublik… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber May 4, 2023 Right to Restriction Right to be Forgotten Personal Data
C-634/21 OQ v Land Hessen In Case C-634/21, the CJEU addressed a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning OQ's challenge against Land Hessen's refusal to order SCHUFA Holding AG… CJEU ·First Chamber Dec 7, 2023 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
C-136/17 GC and Others v CNIL C-136/17 (GC and Others) CJEU Sep 24, 2019 Right to be Forgotten Legitimate Interest Criminal Data
C-77/21 Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In this preliminary ruling, the CJEU interpreted Articles 5(1)(b) and 5(1)(e) GDPR in proceedings between Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. and the Hungarian National Authority… CJEU ·First Chamber Oct 20, 2022 Retention Period Storage Limitation Personal Data
Opinion 11/2024 use of facial recognition to streamline airport passengers’ flow (compatibility with Articles 5(1)(e) and(f), 25 and 32 GDPR) A dopted Opinion 11/2024 on the use of facial recognition to streamline airport passengers’ flow (compatibility with Articles 5(1)(e) and(f), 25 and 32 GDPR Version 1.1 Adopted on… Opinion ·EDPB May 24, 2024 Biometric Data Identification Retention Period