AI Act Recital 170 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 170 — complaint rights for AI regulation infringement

Monitoring Market Surveillance and Control of AI Systems Authority Access Rights to AI Systems and Documentation Post-Market Monitoring for AI Systems Conformity Body Notification AI Incident Notification Interim Measures under AI Act
In force — consolidated2026-07-27 · CELEX 02024R1689-20260727 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2026-07-27in force CELEX 02024R1689-20260727
  • 2024-07-12 CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

Union and national law already provide effective remedies to natural and legal persons whose rights and freedoms are adversely affected by the use of AI systems. Without prejudice to those remedies, any natural or legal person that has grounds to consider that there has been an infringement of this Regulation should be entitled to lodge a complaint to the relevant market surveillance authority.

Related across sources

Literature Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools by Law Enforcement Services in Light of the Artificial Intelligence Act Guidance Statement 3/2024 on data protection authorities’ role in the Artificial Intelligence Act framework Guidance EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2022 on the Proposal for a Regulation on the European Health Data Space Literature From the EU AI Act to Audit Practice: A Governance-to-Controls Framework for Quality Management and Evidence Literature The ethics of regulation: Social contract insights on the 2024 European Union Artificial Intelligence Act Literature Training national judges for digital competition law: the DMA, private enforcement, and the infrastructure of judicial capacity