Without prejudice to the rules provided for in Regulation (EU) 2024/900 of the European Parliament and of the Council(34), and in order to address the risks of undue external interference with the right to vote enshrined in Article 39 of the Charter, and of adverse effects on democracy and the rule of law, AI systems intended to be used to influence the outcome of an election or referendum or the voting behaviour of natural persons in the exercise of their vote in elections or referenda should be classified as high-risk AI systems with the exception of AI systems whose output natural persons are not directly exposed to, such as tools used to organise, optimise and structure political campaigns from an administrative and logistical point of view.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 62
Related across sources
News A call to EU legislators: protect rights and reject the call to delete transparency safeguard in AI Act News The AI Act isn’t enough: closing the dangerous loopholes that enable rights violations News Canada Is Forging Ahead with Its Dangerous Surveillance Bill Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement News The AI law is not sufficient: we must address the dangerous loopholes that enable abuse and violate people's rights. News Is the AI Act caging ChatGPT and other General Purpose Artificial Intelligence systems?