The fact that an AI system is classified as a high-risk AI system under this Regulation should not be interpreted as indicating that the use of the system is lawful under other acts of Union law or under national law compatible with Union law, such as on the protection of personal data, on the use of polygraphs and similar tools or other systems to detect the emotional state of natural persons. Any such use should continue to occur solely in accordance with the applicable requirements resulting from the Charter and from the applicable acts of secondary Union law and national law. This Regulation should not be understood as providing for the legal ground for processing of personal data, including special categories of personal data, where relevant, unless it is specifically otherwise provided for in this Regulation.
AI Act Recital EN
Recital 63
Related across sources
News Italian SA fines a company for post-sick leave questionnaires Guidance Version history Guidance Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679 Guidance Guidelines 9/2022 on personal data breach notification under GDPR Guidance Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement News EDPB and AMLA to develop Joint Guidelines on partnerships for information sharing