Skip to content
News · Electronic Frontier Foundation EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Amending AB 1709 Doesn’t Fix It: California’s Social Media Ban Still Threatens Free Speech and Privacy

California lawmakers have amended A.B.

How it connects

T-70/23 Data Protection Commission v European Data Protection Board The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) challenged provisions of EDPB Binding Decisions 3/2022, 4/2022, and 5/2022, arguing the EDPB exceeded its competence under Article… General Court ·Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition Jan 29, 2025 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Controllers
T-183/23 Lisa Ballmann v European Data Protection Board In Case T-183/23, Lisa Ballmann sought annulment of the European Data Protection Board's decision refusing her request for access to the file prepared for Binding Decision 3/2022,… General Court ·Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition Jul 16, 2025 Right of Access Personal Data Supervision
T-709/21 WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board WhatsApp Ireland Ltd sought annulment of EDPB Binding Decision 1/2021, which resolved disputes among supervisory authorities regarding the Irish DPC's draft decision on WhatsApp's… General Court ·Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition Dec 7, 2022 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Controllers
2016 IEHC 323 High Court examines DPA inquiry into Meta's refusal of raw data access and portability On 25 May 2018, Michael Veale, the data subject, submitted an access and data portability request to Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (MPIL) (then Facebook Ireland Limited), the… Aug 21, 2026 Data Portability Right of Access Procedures Right of Access
C-757/22 Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V In a preliminary ruling requested by the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 80(2) GDPR in the… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Jul 11, 2024 Personal Data Controllers Processors
C-252/21 Meta Platforms v noyb C-252/21 (Meta Platforms (noyb)) CJEU Jan 12, 2023 Supervisory Authorities Supervision Consent

Full text

California lawmakers have amended A.B. 1709, but the core problem remains: the bill is still a ban on social media access for youth under 16, and it still threatens the privacy and First Amendment rights of all Californians. Proponents of the bill may argue that the recent amendments represent a compromise, but a close look at the text shows no major changes. As the bill moves forward in the Senate, we must continue to urge lawmakers to vote NO. Take Action: Tell Your Senator to OPPOSE A.B. 1709 A "Compromise" That Still Denies Access Under the newly amended Section 22683, platforms are prohibited from offering "addictive features" to users under 16. A platform can allow a minor to keep an account only if it strips away these features, which include what the bill calls "addictive feeds," auto-play, and anything else the Attorney General designates in future rulemaking. However, the bill defines "addictive feeds" so broadly that it covers virtually every functional recommendation algori