Enforcement · Garante EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Garante fines controller €5,508,000 for failure to respond to data subject objection

The DPA underscored that the controller sent no follow up with the data subject’s request, and in combination with the fact that the controller only acted after the DPA reached out, constitutes a failure to respond to the data subject’s request to object processing.The DPA underscored that the controller sent no follow up with the data subject’s request, and in combination with the fact that the controller only acted after the DPA reached out, constitutes a failure to respond to the data subject

Original title: Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 613/2026

Italy
Personal Data Controllers Supervisory Authorities
Sep 16, 2026 Source gdprhub.eu

How it connects

Related across sources

2016 IEHC 323 High Court examines DPA inquiry into Meta's refusal of raw data access and portability On 25 May 2018, Michael Veale, the data subject, submitted an access and data portability request to Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (MPIL) (then Facebook Ireland Limited), the… Aug 21, 2026 Data Portability Supervisory Authorities Right of Access Procedures
C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… CJEU ·Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Supervision Right of Access
C-231/22 État belge v Autorité de protection des données In Case C-231/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 4(7) and Article 5(2) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court… CJEU ·Third Chamber Jan 11, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Processing
C-46/23 Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In a preliminary ruling requested by the Budapest High Court, the Court of Justice interpreted whether Article 58(2)(d) and (g) of the GDPR permits a national supervisory… CJEU ·Fifth Chamber Mar 14, 2024 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Restriction
C-604/22 IAB Europe v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In Case C-604/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on a preliminary reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal in proceedings between IAB Europe and the Belgian… CJEU ·Fourth Chamber Mar 7, 2024 Controllers Personal Data Data Controller
C-645/19 Facebook Ireland Ltd and Others v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit In Case C-645/19, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) addressed a preliminary ruling from the Brussels Court of Appeal concerning Facebook Ireland Ltd and… CJEU ·Grand Chamber Jun 15, 2021 Supervision Supervisory Authorities Controllers

Full text

The DPA underscored that the controller sent no follow up with the data subject’s request, and in combination with the fact that the controller only acted after the DPA reached out, constitutes a failure to respond to the data subject’s request to object processing.The DPA underscored that the controller sent no follow up with the data subject’s request, and in combination with the fact that the controller only acted after the DPA reached out, constitutes a failure to respond to the data subject’s request to object processing. In light of the foregoing the DPA found the controller in violation of Articles 5(1)(a), Article 12 and Article 21 GDPR. In light of the conditions to take into account pursuant to Article 83 and the fact that the controller had already band correspondingly imposed a fine of €5,508,000 on them.In light of the foregoing the DPA found the controller in violation of Article 5(1)(a), Article 12 and Article 21 GDPR. In light of the conditions to take into account purs

Related documents