Skip to content
GDPR Art. 83 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

General conditions for imposing administrative fines

In force — consolidated2016-05-04 · CELEX 02016R0679-20160504 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2016-05-04in force CELEX 02016R0679-20160504
  • 2016-04-27 CELEX 32016R0679
  1. 1.

    Each supervisory authority shall ensure that the imposition of administrative fines pursuant to this Article in respect of infringements of this Regulation referred to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 shall in each individual case be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

  2. 2.

    Administrative fines shall, depending on the circumstances of each individual case, be imposed in addition to, or instead of, measures referred to in points (a) to (h) and (j) of Article 58(2). When deciding whether to impose an administrative fine and deciding on the amount of the administrative fine in each individual case due regard shall be given to the following:

    1. a)
      the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement taking into account the nature scope or purpose of the processing concerned as well as the number of data subjects affected and the level of damage suffered by them;
    2. b)
      the intentional or negligent character of the infringement;
    3. c)
      any action taken by the controller or processor to mitigate the damage suffered by data subjects;
    4. d)
      the degree of responsibility of the controller or processor taking into account technical and organisational measures implemented by them pursuant to Articles 25 and 32;
    5. e)
      any relevant previous infringements by the controller or processor;
    6. f)
      the degree of cooperation with the supervisory authority, in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement;
    7. g)
      the categories of personal data affected by the infringement;
    8. h)
      the manner in which the infringement became known to the supervisory authority, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the controller or processor notified the infringement;
    9. i)
      where measures referred to in Article 58(2) have previously been ordered against the controller or processor concerned with regard to the same subject-matter, compliance with those measures;
    10. j)
      adherence to approved codes of conduct pursuant to Article 40 or approved certification mechanisms pursuant to Article 42; and
    11. k)
      any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case, such as financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, directly or indirectly, from the infringement.
  3. 3.

    If a controller or processor intentionally or negligently, for the same or linked processing operations, infringes several provisions of this Regulation, the total amount of the administrative fine shall not exceed the amount specified for the gravest infringement.

  4. 4.

    Infringements of the following provisions shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, be subject to administrative fines up to 10 000 000 EUR, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 2 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:

    1. a)
      the obligations of the controller and the processor pursuant to Articles 8, 11, 25 to 39 and 42 and 43;
    2. b)
      the obligations of the certification body pursuant to Articles 42 and 43;
    3. c)
      the obligations of the monitoring body pursuant to Article 41(4).
  5. 5.

    Infringements of the following provisions shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, be subject to administrative fines up to 20 000 000 EUR, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:

    1. a)
      the basic principles for processing, including conditions for consent, pursuant to Articles 5, 6, 7 and 9;
    2. b)
      the data subjects' rights pursuant to Articles 12 to 22;
    3. c)
      the transfers of personal data to a recipient in a third country or an international organisation pursuant to Articles 44 to 49;
    4. d)
      any obligations pursuant to Member State law adopted under Chapter IX;
    5. e)
      non-compliance with an order or a temporary or definitive limitation on processing or the suspension of data flows by the supervisory authority pursuant to Article 58(2) or failure to provide access in violation of Article 58(1).
  6. 6.

    Non-compliance with an order by the supervisory authority as referred to in Article 58(2) shall, in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, be subject to administrative fines up to 20 000 000 EUR, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.

  7. 7.

    Without prejudice to the corrective powers of supervisory authorities pursuant to Article 58(2), each Member State may lay down the rules on whether and to what extent administrative fines may be imposed on public authorities and bodies established in that Member State.

  8. 8.

    The exercise by the supervisory authority of its powers under this Article shall be subject to appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with Union and Member State law, including effective judicial remedy and due process.

  9. 9.

    Where the legal system of the Member State does not provide for administrative fines, this Article may be applied in such a manner that the fine is initiated by the competent supervisory authority and imposed by competent national courts, while ensuring that those legal remedies are effective and have an equivalent effect to the administrative fines imposed by supervisory authorities. In any event, the fines imposed shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Those Member States shall notify to the Commission the provisions of their laws which they adopt pursuant to this paragraph by 25 May 2018 and, without delay, any subsequent amendment law or amendment affecting them.

Enforcement

Cited in 13 fines totalling €36.6M

Top authority: 🇮🇹Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) (3) · median fine €18,000 · see all enforcement for Art. 83 →

Connections by provision

83(1) 26 Case Law 7 Guidance 3 News .md
Case Law 26
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 63 – Consistency mechanism – Article 65 – Dispute resolution by the European Data Protection Board – Binding decision – Action for annulment – First paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Act open to challenge – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Condition that the Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(2) and (7) – Concepts of ‘processing’ and ‘controller’ – Development of a mobile IT application – Article 26 – Joint control – Arti VwGH - VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007-7 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 7 December 2022.#WhatsApp Ireland Ltd v European Data Protection Board.#Action for annulment – Protection of personal data – Draft decision of the lead supervisory authority – Resolution of disputes between supervisory authorities by the European Data Protection Board – Binding decision – Article 60(4) and Article 65(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Lack of individual concern.#Ca Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21. Deutsche Wohnen SE v Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin +18 more
83(2) 23 Case Law 7 Guidance 1 Literature 2 News .md
Case Law 23
X - BA-6S/221/2019 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(2) and (7) – Concepts of ‘processing’ and ‘controller’ – Development of a mobile IT application – Article 26 – Joint control – Arti Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#AT and BT v PS GbR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wesel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing which infringes that regulation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Impact of the seriousness of the damage suffered – Assessment of t CJEU - C-667/21 - Krankenversicherung Nordrhein Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21. Spanish court reviews DPA decision on KFC Spain website privacy information and DPO Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 13(1) and (2) – Unsolicited communications – Concept of communication ‘for the purposes of di +15 more
83(2)(a) 2 Guidance 1 Literature .md
83(2)(b) 1 Case Law 1 Guidance 1 News .md
83(2)(c) 1 Guidance .md
83(2)(d) 1 Case Law 2 Guidance .md
83(2)(e) 1 Case Law 1 Guidance .md
83(2)(f) 1 Case Law 1 Guidance .md
83(2)(g) 1 Guidance 1 News .md
83(2)(h) 1 Guidance .md
83(2)(i) 1 Guidance .md
83(2)(j) 1 Case Law 1 Guidance .md
83(2)(k) 1 Case Law 1 Guidance .md
83(3) 3 Case Law 4 Guidance 1 News .md
83(4) 30 Case Law 8 Guidance 1 News .md
Case Law 30
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub Deutsche Wohnen SE v Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(2) and (7) – Concepts of ‘processing’ and ‘controller’ – Development of a mobile IT application – Article 26 – Joint control – Arti VwGH - VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007-7 BVwG - W258 2227269-1/39E ¶16 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub ¶13 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub ¶23 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub +22 more
83(4)(a) 8 Case Law 4 Guidance .md
83(4)(b) 2 Guidance .md
83(4)(c) 7 Guidance .md
83(5) 1 Case Law 2 Guidance 1 Literature .md
83(5)(a) 3 Case Law 1 Guidance 1 Literature .md
83(5)(b) 1 Case Law 2 Guidance .md
83(5)(e) 2 Guidance .md
83(6) 1 Case Law 1 Guidance .md
83(7) 9 Case Law 2 Guidance .md
Case Law 9
X - BA-6S/221/2019 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principles relating to processing – Controllership – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Electronic file compiled by an administrative authority relating to an asylum application – Tra Deutsche Wohnen SE v Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(2) and (7) – Concepts of ‘processing’ and ‘controller’ – Development of a mobile IT application – Article 26 – Joint control – Arti ¶43 Deutsche Wohnen SE v Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin ¶3 X - BA-6S/221/2019 ¶68 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 December 2023.#Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras prie Sveikatos apsaugos ministerijos v Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(2) and (7) – Concepts of ‘processing’ and ‘controller’ – Development of a mobile IT application – Article 26 – Joint control – Arti ¶34 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principles relating to processing – Controllership – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Electronic file compiled by an administrative authority relating to an asylum application – Tra +1 more
83(8) 4 Case Law .md
83(9) 3 Case Law .md
Case Law 3
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub ¶33 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub ¶32 Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that sub

Related across sources