Skip to content
GDPR Art. 22 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Automated individual decision-making, including profiling

In force — consolidated2016-05-04 · CELEX 02016R0679-20160504 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2016-05-04in force CELEX 02016R0679-20160504
  • 2016-04-27 CELEX 32016R0679
  1. 1.

    The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.

  2. 2.

    Paragraph 1 shall not apply if the decision:

    1. a)
      is necessary for entering into, or performance of, a contract between the data subject and a data controller;
    2. b)
      is authorised by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject and which also lays down suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests; or
    3. c)
      is based on the data subject's explicit consent.
  3. 3.

    In the cases referred to in points (a) and (c) of paragraph 2, the data controller shall implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, at least the right to obtain human intervention on the part of the controller, to express his or her point of view and to contest the decision.

  4. 4.

    Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 9(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.

Enforcement

Cited in 26 fines totalling €1.7B

Top authority: 🇪🇺Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) (7) · median fine €100,000 · see all enforcement for Art. 22 →

Connections by provision

22(1) 78 Case Law 29 Enforcement 37 Guidance 5 Literature .md
22(2) 5 Case Law 3 Enforcement 25 Guidance .md
22(2)(a) 5 Guidance 2 Literature .md
22(2)(b) 8 Case Law 5 Guidance 1 Literature .md
22(2)(c) 5 Guidance 2 Literature .md
22(3) 10 Case Law 20 Enforcement 18 Guidance 3 Literature 1 News .md
22(4) 3 Case Law 8 Guidance 2 Literature .md

Related across sources

C-203/22 CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien In Case C-203/22, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted Article 15(1)(h) of the GDPR in response to a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien… CJEU ·First Chamber Feb 27, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
W256 2227693-1 Austrian FAC: DPA rightly found loyalty program consent for profiling invalid under GDPR On 05.09.2019, the Austrian DPA (DSB) notified the controller of a customer loyalty program that they were initiating an ex officio investigation. The controller responded by… Federal Administrative Court Sep 28, 2023 Marketing Profiling Automated Decision-Making
C-634/21 OQ v Land Hessen In Case C-634/21, the CJEU addressed a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning OQ's challenge against Land Hessen's refusal to order SCHUFA Holding AG… CJEU ·First Chamber Dec 7, 2023 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse) Artikelen: 5(1)(c), 6(1), en 21 AVG Onderwerp : Beginsel van minimale gegevensverwerking Gek genoeg verwijst het HvJ EU zelf niet naar HvJ EU 1 augustus 2022, C‑184/20… HvJ EU 9 januari 2025, C‑394/23 (Mousse). ·CJEU Jan 9, 2025 IP Address Retention Period Identification
W254 2253353-1 On 7 April 2021, the data subject requested access to their data under Article 15 GDPR The controller replied on 12 April 2021 and provided further information on 27 May 2021 after the data subject made a further enquiry. As the controller's privacy policy listed… BVwG - W254 2253353-1 ·Federal Administrative Court Nov 17, 2025 Profiling Automated Decision-Making Marketing
C-422/24 Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik. A new page has been created with the following information: "" CJEU Jan 7, 2026 Personal Data Fairness & Transparency Controllers