GDPR Art. 75 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this article. Contains: the article text, related recitals, cases citing it, enforcement stats and top fines, guidance, and related topics. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Secretariat

Supervision
In force — consolidated2016-05-04 · CELEX 02016R0679-20160504 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2016-05-04in force CELEX 02016R0679-20160504
  • 2016-04-27 CELEX 32016R0679
  1. 1.

    The Board shall have a secretariat, which shall be provided by the European Data Protection Supervisor.

    2
  2. 2.

    The secretariat shall perform its tasks exclusively under the instructions of the Chair of the Board.

    6
  3. 3.

    The staff of the European Data Protection Supervisor involved in carrying out the tasks conferred on the Board by this Regulation shall be subject to separate reporting lines from the staff involved in carrying out tasks conferred on the European Data Protection Supervisor.

  4. 4.

    Where appropriate, the Board and the European Data Protection Supervisor shall establish and publish a Memorandum of Understanding implementing this Article, determining the terms of their cooperation, and applicable to the staff of the European Data Protection Supervisor involved in carrying out the tasks conferred on the Board by this Regulation.

  5. 5.

    The secretariat shall provide analytical, administrative and logistical support to the Board.

  6. 6.

    The secretariat shall be responsible in particular for:

    2
    1. a)
      the day-to-day business of the Board;
    2. b)
      communication between the members of the Board, its Chair and the Commission;
    3. c)
      communication with other institutions and the public;
    4. d)
      the use of electronic means for the internal and external communication;
    5. e)
      the translation of relevant information;
    6. f)
      the preparation and follow-up of the meetings of the Board;
    7. g)
      the preparation, drafting and publication of opinions, decisions on the settlement of disputes between supervisory authorities and other texts adopted by the Board.
      Supervision

Enforcement

Cited in 1 fines totalling €7K

Top authority: 🇪🇺Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) (1) · median fine €7,000 · see all enforcement for Art. 75 →

Connections by provision

75(1) 2 Case Law .md
Case Law 2
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 8 April 2014.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/46/EC — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data — Article 28(1) — National supervisory authorities — Independence — National legislation prematurely bringing to an end the term served by the supervisory authority — Creation of a new supervisory authority and appointment of another per ¶61 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 8 April 2014.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/46/EC — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data — Article 28(1) — National supervisory authorities — Independence — National legislation prematurely bringing to an end the term served by the supervisory authority — Creation of a new supervisory authority and appointment of another per
75(2) 6 Case Law .md
Case Law 6
Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 279 TFEU – Application for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independence of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Disciplinary regime for judges – Examination of quest Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 27 October 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 279 TFEU – Application for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Disciplinary regime for judges – Examination of questions of law concerning the lack of independence of judges – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-204/21 R Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 21 April 2023.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Application to cancel or vary an order for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Non-execution – Change in circumstances – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-204/21 R- ¶17 Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 27 October 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 279 TFEU – Application for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Disciplinary regime for judges – Examination of questions of law concerning the lack of independence of judges – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-204/21 R ¶17 Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 279 TFEU – Application for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independence of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Disciplinary regime for judges – Examination of quest ¶17 Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 21 April 2023.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Interim relief – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Application to cancel or vary an order for interim measures – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Independence of judges – Non-execution – Change in circumstances – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-204/21 R-
75(6) 2 Guidance .md
Guidance 2
EDPB Article 97 GDPR application report: GDPR successful but improvements needed Contribution of the EDPB to the evaluation of the GDPR under Article 97
75(6)(c) 1 Guidance .md
Guidance 1
EDPB Article 97 GDPR application report: GDPR successful but improvements needed
75(6)(d) 2 Guidance .md
Guidance 2
Contribution of the EDPB to the evaluation of the GDPR under Article 97 EDPB Article 97 GDPR application report: GDPR successful but improvements needed
75(6)(e) 1 Guidance .md
Guidance 1
Contribution of the EDPB to the evaluation of the GDPR under Article 97
75(6)(g) 3 Guidance .md
Guidance 3
Contribution of the EDPB to the evaluation of the GDPR under Article 97 EDPB Article 97 GDPR application report: GDPR successful but improvements needed Guidelines 03/2021 on the application of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR