Enforcement · Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Regione Lazio: Insufficient data processing agreement

The Italian DPA (Garante) has fined Regione Lazio (Lazio Region) EUR 75,000 for failing to designate Capodarco, the company it entrusted with the management of reservations for healthcare services in 1999, as a data processor.

€75,000 Fine
Regione Lazio
ITALY
Art. 5 GDPR Art. 28 GDPR
Processors Controllers Processing Supervisory Authorities Processing Agreement
Jan 14, 2021 Source garanteprivacy.it

Full text

The Italian DPA (Garante) has fined Regione Lazio (Lazio Region) EUR 75,000 for failing to designate Capodarco, the company it entrusted with the management of reservations for healthcare services in 1999, as a data processor. The controller had not entered into a contract with Capodarco that would have governed its role as data processor in accordance with the requirements of data protection law. Thus, a proper contract for commissioned processing had not been concluded until 2019, which meant that data had been processed unlawfully for a period of about 20 years.

Industry: Public Sector and Education

How it connects

References

Related across sources

C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14 (Schrems I) CJEU Oct 6, 2015 Privacy Shield Supervision IP Address
Guidelines 07/2020 concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR Guidelines ·EDPB Jul 7, 2021 Controllers Processors IP Address
C-807/21 Deutsche Wohnen SE v Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin C-807/21 (Deutsche Wohnen) CJEU Dec 5, 2023 Fines Public Authority Processors
C-311/18 Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems C-311/18 (Schrems II) CJEU Jul 16, 2020 Privacy Shield Processing Agreement International Transfer
S 5 SF 65/24 DS SG Nürnberg: MOVEit zero-day cyberattack via processor did not breach Art. 32 GDPR The data subject (a child born in 2018), represented by her parents, was insured with the controller (a statutory health insurance provider) and participated in its digital bonus… Social Court Nuremberg Jun 10, 2026 Processors Controllers Integrity and Confidentiality Principle
C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… CJEU ·Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Supervision
Related documents