Case Law · CJEU ·C-422/24 EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik

This is a second record of the same decision. The full record is here: Court of Justice of the European Union - Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.

Judgment

Personal Data Controllers Human Resources Transparency Law Enforcement
Jan 7, 2026

Full text 2 paragraphs

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that when personal data is collected through cameras worn by inspectors in public transport, the obligation to provide information to the individuals concerned is governed by Article 13 of the GDPR, and not by Article 14. The CJEU has ruled that when personal data is collected through cameras worn by inspectors in public transport, the obligation to provide information to the individuals concerned is governed by Article 13 of the GDPR, and not by Article 14 of the GDPR. Summary in English. Summary in English. Following an investigation, the Swedish Authority for Data Protection found that the responsible party had violated several provisions of the GDPR, including the obligation to provide information to the individuals concerned. The authority imposed an administrative fine totaling 16,000,000 SEK (approximately €1,420,670), of which 4,000,000 SEK (approximately €355,188) related to the failure to provide information to the individuals concerned.

Personal Data applies Art. 13Art. 14
§

Following an investigation, the Swedish Authority for Data Protection found that... --- *This content has been automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.* --- *This content was automatically translated using machine translation. The original version is available in the source language.*

How it connects

This case elsewhere

1 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓

References

Related across sources

2018 Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01) Guidelines on transparency EDPB Apr 11, 2018 Transparency Information Provision Modalities and Communication Methods Fairness & Transparency
Guidelines 4/2019 Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0 Adopted on 20 October 2020 Guidelines on data protection by design and by default Guidelines ·EDPB Oct 20, 2020 Privacy by Design & Default Privacy by Default Privacy by Design
Guidelines 5/2019 criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1) Guidelines ·EDPB Jul 7, 2020 Right to be Forgotten Personal Data Right to Rectification
Guidelines 06/2022 practical implementation of amicable settlements Guidelines on the processing of personal data under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR in the context of the provision of online services to data subjects Guidelines ·EDPB May 12, 2022 Supervision Personal Data Processing
Guidelines 01/2022 data subject rights - Right of access Guidelines ·EDPB Apr 17, 2023 Right of Access Personal Data Right to Rectification
2022 EDPB Annual Report 2021 Enhancing the depth and breadth of data protection 2 EDPB Annual Report 2021 2 ENHANCING THE DEPTH AND BREADTH OF DATA PROTECTION An Executive Summary of this report, which… May 12, 2022 Privacy Shield Processing Agreement International Transfer
Related documents