Laws · GDPR ·art-89-par-1 EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.
Full text
Processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes, shall be subject to appropriate safeguards, in accordance with this Regulation, for the rights and freedoms of the data subject. Those safeguards shall ensure that technical and organisational measures are in place in particular in order to ensure respect for the principle of data minimisation. Those measures may include pseudonymisation provided that those purposes can be fulfilled in that manner. Where those purposes can be fulfilled by further processing which does not permit or no longer permits the identification of data subjects, those purposes shall be fulfilled in that manner.
How it connects
Cited by
- Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679
- Guidelines 5/2019 on the criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1)
- Art. 29 WP Guidelines on GDPR transparency requirements (WP260 rev.01)
- Rijeka Court: AZOP decision on media reporting of former Zagrebački Holding board
- hier
All 39
- Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Study on the secondary use of personal data in the context of scientific research
- Opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Directive amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision
- Court of Justice of the European Union - Case C-422/24 - AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.
- EDPB-EDPS Joint opinion 2/2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework (
- If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it? Ten improvements for the upcoming tenth anniversary of the General Data Protection Regulation
- AEPD (Spain) - EXP202102529
- AEPD admits claim against Securitas Direct for failure to handle access and erasure
- Opinion 15/2023 on the draft decision of the Dutch Supervisory Authority regarding the Brand Compliance certification criteria
- EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2022 on the Proposal for a Regulation on the European Health Data Space
- Opinion 1/2022 on the draft decision of the Luxembourg Supervisory Authority regarding the GDPR – CARPA certification criteria
- EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2021 on the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European data governance (Data Governance Act)
- EDPB Document on response to the request from the European Commission for clarifications on the consistent application of the GDPR, focusing on health research
- Guidelines 03/2020 on the processing of data concerning health for the purpose of scientific research in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak
- Opinion 3/2019 concerning the Questions and Answers on the interplay between the Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR) and the General Data Protection regulation (GDPR)
- Article 29 Working Party - Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679
- Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik
- Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde
- Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC
- État belge v Autorité de protection des données
- UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer beim Hessischen Kultusministerium v Minister des Hessischen Kultusministeriums
- RW v Österreichische Post AG
- Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
- NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH-450-7-2026
- BVwG - W214 2235505-1
- Federal Administrative Court: retention of job applicant data for potential legal claims
- BVwG - W137 2334047-1
- BVwG - W292 2292202-1
- BVwG - W292 2298015-1
- BVwG reduces DPA fine for undisclosed call recording from €25,500 to €22,000
- Finnish DPA finds 12-year retention of rental applicant data violates minimisation
- Austrian Federal Administrative Court: address publisher's data transfer and Article 15
Related across sources
C-77/21 Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság In this preliminary ruling, the CJEU interpreted Articles 5(1)(b) and 5(1)(e) GDPR in proceedings between Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. and the Hungarian National Authority… First Chamber Oct 20, 2022 Retention Period Storage Limitation Personal Data
C-175/20 SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests In Case C-175/20, the Court of Justice of the EU interpreted GDPR Articles 5 and 6 in response to a preliminary ruling from the Latvian Regional Administrative Court concerning a… Fifth Chamber Feb 24, 2022 Retention Period Personal Data Legitimate Interest
C-169/23 Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság v UC In Case C-169/23, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Kúria (Hungary) concerning whether the Budapest Metropolitan… Third Chamber Nov 28, 2024 Personal Data Legitimate Interest Supervision
C-340/21 VB v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite C-340/21 (VB v Natsionalna agentsia) Dec 14, 2023 Integrity and Confidentiality Principle Data Breaches Notification Obligation
C-136/17 GC and Others v CNIL C-136/17 (GC and Others) Sep 24, 2019 Right to be Forgotten Legitimate Interest Criminal Data
C-268/21 Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB In Case C-268/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Swedish Supreme Court in proceedings between Norra Stockholm… Third Chamber Mar 2, 2023 Retention Period Anonymization Personal Data