Skip to content
Case Law · CJEU EN LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this document. Contains: this document’s text, its sections with their topics, and the full text of every law provision it applies. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy

Judgment

legal ground
AG Opinion
Summary

Lawful basis (in general): Subject to the exceptions permitted under Article 13 of the Data Protection Directive, all processing of personal data must comply, first, with the principles relating to data quality (in Article 6 of that directive) and, have lawful basis (by complying with one criteria for making data processing legitimate listed in Article 7 of that directive) (see, Bara). The list of lawful basis in Article 7 is an exhaustive and restrictive list of cases in which the processing of

Full text 2 paragraphs

Paragraphs carrying a topic or an applied provision show those connections inline
§

## Court Summary Lawful Basis (Public Interest): Article 7(e) Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as not precluding the processing of personal data by the authorities of a Member State for the purpose of collecting tax and combating tax fraud such as that effected by drawing up the contested list in the main proceedings, without the consent of the data subjects, “provided that, first, those authorities were invested by the national legislation with tasks carried out in the public interest within the meaning of that article, that the drawing-up of that list and the inclusion on it of the names of the data subjects in fact be appropriate and necessary for the purpose of attaining the objectives pursued and that there be sufficient indications to assume that the data subjects are rightly included in that list and, second, that all of the conditions for the lawfulness of that processing of personal data imposed by Directive 95/46 be satisfied.”

§

(¶117) ## Excerpt 117 In the light of the foregoing considerations, the answer to the second question is that Article 7(e) Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as not precluding the processing of personal data by the authorities of a Member State for the purpose of collecting tax and combating tax fraud such as that effected by drawing up the contested list in the main proceedings, without the consent of the data subjects, provided that, first, those authorities were invested by the national legislation with tasks carried out in the public interest within the meaning of that article, that the drawing-up of that list and the inclusion on it of the names of the data subjects in fact be appropriate and necessary for the purpose of attaining the objectives pursued and that there be sufficient indications to assume that the data subjects are rightly included in that list and, second, that all of the conditions for the lawfulness of that processing of personal data imposed by Directive 95/46 be satisfied.

How it connects

2 of 2 paragraphs apply legislation or carry a topic — see them in the full text ↓
Guidelines 05/2020 consent under Regulation 2016/679 Guidelines on consent Guidelines ·EDPB May 4, 2020 Consent Data Portability Personal Data
Guidelines 2/2018 derogations of Article 49 under Regulation 2016/679 Guidelines on derogations of Article 49 Guidelines ·EDPB May 25, 2018 Privacy Shield Lawful Basis Legitimate Interest
HDPA investigates Greek Infrastructure Ministry for SMS sent without consent or The DPA started an investigation, after receiving 83 complaints from data subjects, against the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transportation (the controller). Particularly,… 17/2026 ·Greece ·Art. 5, 14 Sep 15, 2026 Consent Right to Object Personal Data