Skip to content
GDPR Recital 150 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 150 — administrative fines for regulation infringements

In force — consolidated2016-05-04 · CELEX 02016R0679-20160504 · ELI ↗
Version history 2
  • 2016-05-04in force CELEX 02016R0679-20160504
  • 2016-04-27 CELEX 32016R0679

In order to strengthen and harmonise administrative penalties for infringements of this Regulation, each supervisory authority should have the power to impose administrative fines. This Regulation should indicate infringements and the upper limit and criteria for setting the related administrative fines, which should be determined by the competent supervisory authority in each individual case, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the specific situation, with due regard in particular to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences and the measures taken to ensure compliance with the obligations under this Regulation and to prevent or mitigate the consequences of the infringement. Where administrative fines are imposed on an undertaking, an undertaking should be understood to be an undertaking in accordance with Articles 101 and 102 TFEU for those purposes. Where administrative fines are imposed on persons that are not an undertaking, the supervisory authority should take account of the general level of income in the Member State as well as the economic situation of the person in considering the appropriate amount of the fine. The consistency mechanism may also be used to promote a consistent application of administrative fines. It should be for the Member States to determine whether and to which extent public authorities should be subject to administrative fines. Imposing an administrative fine or giving a warning does not affect the application of other powers of the supervisory authorities or of other penalties under this Regulation.

Related across sources

C-768/21 TR v Land Hessen In Case C-768/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) ruled on a preliminary reference from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden concerning TR's challenge of… CJEU ·First Chamber Sep 26, 2024 Supervision Data Breaches Supervisory Authorities
449209 CE asks CJEU if GDPR one-stop-shop applies to ePrivacy cookie consent cases On 7 December 2020, the French DPA (CNIL) imposed two fines totaling € 100 million on Google LLC and Google Ireland Ltd for violating Article 82 of the French Data Protection Act… Jan 28, 2022 Consent Supervision Supervisory Authorities
451423 French Supreme Court reviews CNIL €35M cookie consent fine against Amazon The French DPA had received a complaint on 28 May 2018 regarding the lawfulness of processing by Amazon Europe Core ('Provider' or 'The company'). The French DPA had forwarded… Supreme Administrative Court Jun 27, 2022 Consent Cookies Supervision
2016 IEHC 323 High Court examines DPA inquiry into Meta's refusal of raw data access and portability On 25 May 2018, Michael Veale, the data subject, submitted an access and data portability request to Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (MPIL) (then Facebook Ireland Limited), the… Aug 21, 2026 Data Portability Supervisory Authorities Right of Access Procedures
C-741/21 GP v juris GmbH In Case C-741/21, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) addressed a preliminary reference from the Landgericht Saarbrücken in proceedings between data subject… CJEU ·Third Chamber Apr 11, 2024 Liability Personal Data Fines