AI Act Recital 66 EN
LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this law. Contains: the full text of every article, recital and provision of this law. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

Recital 66 — requirements for high-risk AI systems

Annex III Amendments High-Risk AI Classification AI Risk Assessment Transparency AI Act Requirements AI Act Formal Non-Compliance Human Oversight Provider Obligations for AI Systems
In force — consolidated2024-07-12 · CELEX 02024R1689-20240712 · ELI ↗
Version history 1
  • 2024-07-12in force CELEX 02024R1689-20240712

Requirements should apply to high-risk AI systems as regards risk management, the quality and relevance of data sets used, technical documentation and record-keeping, transparency and the provision of information to deployers, human oversight, and robustness, accuracy and cybersecurity. Those requirements are necessary to effectively mitigate the risks for health, safety and fundamental rights. As no other less trade restrictive measures are reasonably available those requirements are not unjustified restrictions to trade.

Related across sources

Literature The ethics of regulation: Social contract insights on the 2024 European Union Artificial Intelligence Act Literature Eu regulatory ecosystem for ethical AI Literature Perspectives for Open Source AI Literature General-Purpose AI under the EU AI Act: A Conceptual Allocation of Duties across the Value Chain Literature REGULATION OF APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AS A HIGH-RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IN THE EU AI ACT Literature Italy’s Artificial Intelligence Act and Global AI Governance: The EU Model’s Practice and Prospects