Article 70
Designation of national competent authorities and single points of contact
This new topic is needed to specifically address the DSA requirement for service providers to maintain accessible points of contact for recipients of services, including procedures for designation, accessibility requirements, and communication obligations.
Article 11 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) governs the requirement for providers of intermediary services to establish a single point of contact for recipients of their services and for authorities. While the provided authoritative commentary focuses on the GDPR, the DSA's analogous requirement is a core operational obligation. The law mandates that providers designate a point of contact whose details are publicly available, easily accessible, and directly enable recipients and authorities to communicate rapidly and efficiently. This obligation is distinct from the legal representative requirement under Article 13 and applies to all providers, regardless of their place of establishment, if they offer services in the Union.
The point of contact is not merely a public email address. It must function as an effective channel for direct communication. According to the DSA's rationale and the principles synthesized from the commentary, this requires organizations to ensure the contact is monitored and capable of engaging substantively with communications. This includes receiving notices related to illegal content, orders from authorities, and inquiries from recipients. The requirement for "rapid" communication implies that automated or unmonitored mailboxes are insufficient; there must be a system to ensure timely acknowledgment and routing of communications. While specific DSA case law is still developing, the enforcement expectation is that this contact facilitates the practical application of other DSA obligations, such as notice-and-action procedures.
Designation of national competent authorities and single points of contact
Competent authorities and single points of contact
Points of contact for Member States’ authorities, the Commission and the Board
Points of contact for recipients of the service
Rechtbank
In publicatie van SOMO worden drie NL zakenmannen in verband gebracht met (medeplichtigheid aan) genocide wegens vervullen van een 'sleutelrol' bij de levering van onderdelen aan wapenfabrikanten. In kort geding wordt geoordeeld dat SOMO hiermee te ver is gegaan omdat voor die vergaande persoonlijke betrokkenheid onvoldoende steun bestaat in het feitenmateriaal. Rectificatie bevolen.
Schecke
Purpose for processing: The legislation at issue does base the processing on consent. Rather, it provides that they are to be informed. Thus, processing is not based on their consent. (¶ 54)