Skip to content
Topic Developing

Transparency Reporting Obligations Overview

LLM context A cited markdown file you can paste into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, a RAG or project knowledge base) to ground it in this topic. Contains: the overview, key law text, case law, enforcement and guidance for this topic. Everything links back to its source on overview.legal — legal information, not advice.

While individual aspects of transparency reporting are covered by existing topics, there is no comprehensive overview topic that addresses transparency reporting obligations as a unified framework under DSA Article 24, including the general principles, scope, and procedural requirements.

10 linked items 5 Laws2 News2 Literature1 Tools

Overview

9 sources · Sep 8, 2026

Legal Framework

Transparency reporting obligations under the Digital Services Act form a layered framework that scales with the type of service provider. Three articles establish the core requirements: Article 15 sets the baseline for all providers of intermediary services, Article 24 adds obligations for online platforms, and Article 42 imposes the most demanding regime on very large online platforms (VLOPs) and very large online search engines (VLOSEs).

Article 15 requires annual public reporting on content moderation activity, including orders received from Member State authorities, notices submitted under Article 16, proactive moderation measures, and the use of automated tools. The format requirements are explicit:

"Providers of intermediary services shall make publicly available, in a machine-readable format and in an easily accessible manner, at least once a year, clear, easily comprehensible reports on any content moderation that they engaged in during the relevant period."
— DSA Art. 15(1)

Article 24 layers additional reporting on top of the Article 15 baseline. Online platforms must report on out-of-court dispute settlement outcomes, suspension statistics under Article 23, and average monthly active recipients in the Union. Critically, the recipient data must be updated and communicated to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment upon request without undue delay.

Article 42 accelerates the reporting cadence for VLOPs and VLOSEs to at least every six months and adds granular detail requirements:

"Providers of very large online platforms or of very large online search engines shall publish the reports referred to in Article 15 at the latest by two months from the date of application referred to in Article 33(6), second subparagraph, and thereafter at least every six months."
— DSA Art. 42(1)

VLOP reports must additionally specify human resources dedicated to content moderation broken down by official EU language, staff qualifications and linguistic expertise, and accuracy indicators disaggregated by language.

Key Developments

No court rulings or enforcement decisions interpreting the DSA transparency reporting provisions are yet on record. The framework entered application on 17 February 2023 for online platforms, with VLOP obligations following under the Article 33(6) timeline. The practical thresholds are therefore drawn directly from the statutory text and delegated acts referenced therein.

The interaction between Articles 15 and 24 operates through incorporation by reference:

"In addition to the information referred to in Article 15, providers of online platforms shall include in the reports referred to in that Article information on the following:"
— DSA Art. 24(1)

This means online platforms cannot satisfy their obligations with Article 15 reporting alone; both articles apply cumulatively. For VLOPs, Article 42 further stacks on both, creating a three-tier reporting pyramid.

Status of the Debate

This topic is developing. No dominant doctrinal pattern has emerged yet because the DSA transparency reporting regime is in its early implementation phase. Key open questions include the precise methodology for calculating average monthly active recipients under Article 24(2) (pending delegated acts under Article 33(3)), the standard for "meaningful and comprehensible information" about automated content moderation under Article 15(1)(c), and the extent to which codes of conduct under Article 45 may supplement or refine reporting expectations. Resolution will likely come through Commission delegated acts, Digital Services Coordinator guidance, and initial enforcement actions for non-compliance.

Practical Guidance

  • Map your service tier first. Determine whether you are a mere intermediary, hosting provider, online platform, or VLOP/VLOSE, as each tier triggers cumulative reporting obligations under Articles 15, 24, and 42 respectively.

  • Publish in machine-readable format. Article 15(1) mandates machine-readable, easily accessible publication. Use structured data formats (e.g., CSV, JSON, XML) and maintain a stable, publicly accessible repository for all reports.

  • Track the correct cadence. Intermediary services and online platforms report at least annually; VLOPs and VLOSEs must report at least every six months under Article 42(1). Align internal data collection cycles accordingly.

  • Disaggregate by language for VLOP reporting. Article 42(2) requires content moderation staffing, qualifications, and accuracy indicators broken down by each applicable official EU language. Build data infrastructure that captures these dimensions from the outset.

  • Prepare for ad hoc requests. Article 24(3) requires communication of updated recipient information to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment and the Commission upon request without undue delay. Maintain real-time or near-real-time capability to produce this data.

Everything on this topic ranked by relevance · links go to the exact provision / paragraph / section